Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28050817›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2017

Phosphatidylcholine Coatings Deliver Local Antimicrobials and Reduce Infection in a Murine Model: A Preliminary Study.

Michael A Harris, Karen E Beenken, Mark S Smeltzer, Warren O Haggard, J Amber Jennings

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevention and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Innovations in osteomyelitis research: A review of animal models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Therapeutics and delivery vehicles for local treatment of osteomyelitis.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Review
  9. Biofilm dispersion.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A HarrisThe University of Memphis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 330 Engineering Technology, 3796 Norriswood Avenue, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. Mhrris18@memphis.edu.
Karen E BeenkenDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology and Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Mark S SmeltzerDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology and Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Warren O HaggardThe University of Memphis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 330 Engineering Technology, 3796 Norriswood Avenue, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA.
J Amber JenningsThe University of Memphis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 330 Engineering Technology, 3796 Norriswood Avenue, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA.
University of Memphis · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhosphatidylcholine coatings have been shown to elute antibiotics for several days. A recently developed biofilm inhibitor, cis-2-decenoic acid (C2DA), has been shown to exhibit synergistic activity with several common antibiotics. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of C2DA and amikacin dual drug delivery from a phosphatidylcholine coating. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the in vitro elution profiles of amikacin and C2DA from phosphatidylcholine-coated coupons in incubated phosphate-buffered saline? (2) Does the presence of C2DA in eluate samples lower the amount of amikacin needed for bacterial inhibition in overnight bacterial turbidity assays? (3) Does addition of amikacin and C2DA result in decreased colony-forming units (CFUs) on wire implants and bone when compared with phosphatidylcholine coatings alone in a mouse model of periprosthetic joint infection?

methodsEffects of loading concentrations were assessed during 7-day in vitro elution studies for coatings containing all mixtures of 0%, 5%, 15%, and 25% wt of amikacin and C2DA (n = 4) through quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography concentration determination and plotting concentration eluted over time. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by overnight turbidity testing of elution study samples against Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In vivo efficacy was assessed using phosphatidylcholine-coated wire implants in a murine (mouse) model of infection (n = 3). Wire implants were coated with phosphatidylcholine containing no antimicrobials, amikacin alone, C2DA alone, or amikacin and C2DA and then inserted into the intramedullary femur of each mouse and inoculated with S aureus. The number of viable bacterial colonies on the implant surface and in the surrounding bone was determined after 1 week with the goal of achieving complete bacterial clearance. Total viable CFU count and proportion of samples achieving complete clearance were compared between groups.

resultsElution samples showed a burst response of amikacin and C2DA for 1 to 2 days with C2DA release continuing at low levels through Day 4. All tested eluate samples inhibited P aeruginosa. Samples from coatings containing 25% amikacin or 15% amikacin and any amount of C2DA were able to inhibit S aureus formation, but all coatings with 5% amikacin or 15% amikacin but no C2DA were not inhibitory. All in vivo treatment groups achieved complete bacterial clearance on the wire implant, and the C2DA alone and amikacin alone coatings cleared all CFUs in bone (pin: phosphatidylcholine only one of three; amikacin three of three, C2DA three of three, amikacin + C2DA three of three, p = 0.04 [Fisher's exact test]; bone: coating only: zero of three; amikacin: three of three; C2DA; three of three; C2DA + amikacin: one of three; p = 0.03 [Fisher's exact test]).

conclusionsPhosphatidylcholine coatings elute antimicrobials in vitro under infinite sink conditions for up to 4 days in phosphate-buffered saline and were able to reduce bacterial colonies in a preliminary in vivo model. Turbidity testing with eluate samples containing varying amounts of C2DA and amikacin agrees with previous studies showing synergy between them. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Used as an adjunctive to systemic therapy, C2DA-loaded phosphatidylcholine coatings have potential value as a prophylactic infection prevention measure. Future studies may include different antibiotics, animal studies with larger sample sizes and more controls, and advanced coating delivery methods.

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatibleDrug CarriersAmikacinAnimalsBiofilmsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhosphatidylcholinesPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureus2-decenoic acidAmikacinCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDrug CarriersFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedPhosphatidylcholines

Identifiers

PMID28050817
PMCPMC5449318
OpenAlexW2565926104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.