Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28050708›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Perceptions of weight management counseling among gynecologic cancer survivors: opportunities for enhancing survivorship care.

Alexandra K Zaleta, Robert Neff, Georgia A McCann, David M O'Malley, Kristen M Carpenter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interleukin-6 and body mass index, tobacco use, and sleep in gynecologic cancers.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Article
  7. Gynecologic oncology reports · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra K ZaletaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Robert NeffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Georgia A McCannDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
David M O'MalleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Kristen M CarpenterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Kristen.Carpenter@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOncology practice guidelines recommend incorporating weight management efforts throughout survivorship care; however, some oncologists raise concerns about implementing weight management counseling without damaging patient-provider relationships. This study explores cancer survivors' receptivity to weight management counseling and examines whether views of counseling effectiveness are associated with individual characteristics including health-related perceptions or psychological distress.

methodsPatients presenting to a NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center gynecologic oncology ambulatory clinic were asked to complete a survey assessing health and weight history, health perceptions, psychological distress, provider preferences, and weight management counseling perceptions.

resultsTwo hundred forty-four gynecologic cancer patients (38% endometrial, 37% ovarian, 16% cervical, 8% other) completed surveys. Mean participant BMI was 31.6 (SD = 9.6); 69% were overweight/obese. Most survivors (≥85%) agreed that oncologists should discuss healthy eating, exercise, and weight loss; only 14% reported receiving weight management counseling from their oncologist. 79% reported being more likely to attempt weight loss if counseled by a physician; 59% reported counseling would not be offensive. Regression results indicated that viewing weight management counseling as effective was associated with fewer depressive symptoms and greater enjoyment of physical activity, while viewing counseling unfavorably was associated with a history of attempting multiple weight loss strategies and an overall view of healthy behaviors as less beneficial (ps < .05).

conclusionsMost gynecologic cancer survivors want weight management counseling from oncologists and believe counseling is effective rather than deleterious, yet obesity remains inadequately addressed. Results from this study highlight important topics to be incorporated into weight management counseling.

Indexed as

Body WeightCounselingFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedObesityPerceptionSurvival RateSurvivorsCancer survivorshipGynecologic oncologyHealth communicationObesityPatient preferenceWeight management counseling

Identifiers

PMID28050708
OpenAlexW2561710306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.