Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28050669›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

USA300, A strain of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, crossing Belgium's borders: outbreak of skin and soft tissue infections in a hospital in Belgium.

K Kaïret, E Ho, D Van Kerkhoven, J Boes, S Van Calenbergh, L Pattyn, P Lemay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epidemiology of the Staphylococcus aureus CA-MRSA USA300 in Belgium.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K KaïretDepartment of Paediatrics, Sint-Jozef AZ Turnhout vzw, Campus Sint-Jozef Steenweg op Merksplas 44, 2300, Turnhout, Belgium. kairetkoen@gmail.com.
E HoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium.
D Van KerkhovenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium.
J BoesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium.
S Van CalenberghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium.
L PattynDepartment of Paediatrics, Sint-Jozef AZ Turnhout vzw, Campus Sint-Jozef Steenweg op Merksplas 44, 2300, Turnhout, Belgium.
P LemayDepartment of Paediatrics, Sint-Jozef AZ Turnhout vzw, Campus Sint-Jozef Steenweg op Merksplas 44, 2300, Turnhout, Belgium.
AZ Turnhout · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto investigate an outbreak of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) USA300 in a hospital setting, and the effect of infection control measures.

designoutbreak investigation and retrospective chart review.

settinglocal inpatient and outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: all patients with a history of skin and soft tissue infections with culture-confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 infection from September, 2014, through June, 2015.

interventionsan outbreak investigation with a "search and destroy" policy was carried out. A review of infection control practices was conducted. Chart reviews were conducted to study the management and outcomes of the patients. Infection control measures included education and cultures of skin colonization sites (anterior nares, pharynx, perineum). Specific decontamination schemes for uncomplicated and complicated carriers were enforced. Separate decontamination schemes for neonates and children under 5 years of age were implemented.

resultsbetween September 2014 and June 2015, 12 clinical cases and six carriers were identified. Of the twelve clinical presentations with positive cultures, eight were children. Of the four patients who had a relapse, three were children (75%). After outbreak investigation and infection control measures have been implemented, three persistent carriers remained. A policy of periodic screening, consultation, and watchful waiting for skin infections was instituted for these patients. No new cases linked to the CA-MRSA outbreak have since been reported.

conclusionwe report the first Belgian outbreak of CA-MRSA USA300 in this article. A strict search and destroy strategy and continued surveillance are required in the management of CA-MRSA USA300.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAdultBelgiumChild, PreschoolCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleHospitalsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfection ControlInpatientsMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusOutpatientsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28050669
OpenAlexW2563916107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.