ReviewJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016
Protocol Writing in Clinical Research.
Review in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effects of reserpine on depression: A systematic review.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2023Pooled it
- The Design of a Patient-Centered Hierarchal Composite Outcome for a Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial in Metastatic Bone Disease.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Trial
- Strategies to Enhance Satisfaction and Success in an Academic Career in Pharmacoepidemiology.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Laying the groundwork and designing for trust: why research protocols matter.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Open Science in Undergraduate Medical Education: An International Framework for Transparency, Responsibility, and Professional Identity Formation.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Recruiters' lived experiences in COVID-19 vaccine trials in eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2025Article
- Leaflet: Operative Steps for Interventional Studies in Neuroscience.Neurology international · 2024Article
- The Role of Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials: Safeguarding Data Integrity and Compliance.Cureus · 2024Review
- The Social Return on Investment in programs designed for young people living with a family member who experiences mental health challenges: study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Accessing Anonymised Data from Ireland's Maternal and Newborn Clinical Management System for Research Purposes.HRB open research · 2024Article
- 10 Tips for Planning and Publishing Clinical Research.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Federated causal inference based on real-world observational data sources: application to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness assessment.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Design a Clinical Research Protocol: Influence of Real-World Setting.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The science behind soft skills: Do's and Don'ts for early career researchers and beyond. A review paper from the EU-CardioRNA COST Action CA17129.Open research Europe · 2023Article
- Principles and recommendations for incorporating estimands into clinical study protocol templates.Trials · 2022Article
- A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018.BMC urology · 2022Review
- Implementing OECD GLP principles for the evaluation of novel vector control tools: a case study with two novel LLINs, SafeNetMalaria journal · 2022Article
- ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: limitations and potential next steps for modeling and modelers in the animal sciences.Journal of animal science · 2022Review
- Critical Appraisal of Clinical Research.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Review
- How to Write a Research Protocol: Tips and Tricks.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2016
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Writing a research proposal is probably one of the most challenging and difficult task as research is a new area for the majority of postgraduates and new researchers. The purpose of this article is to summarize the most important steps and necessary guidelines for producing a standard research protocol. Academic and administrative success of any project is usually determined by acquiring a grant for the related field of research. Hence, the quality of a protocol is primarily required to achieve success in this scientific competition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.