Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28049748›Full record

ReviewNutrition reviews2017

Maternal nutrition: opportunities in the prevention of gestational diabetes.

Irma Silva-Zolezzi, Tinu Mary Samuel, Jörg Spieldenner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irma Silva-ZolezziJ. Spieldenner and T.M. Samuel are with Public Health Nutrition, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland. I. Silva-Zolezzi is with Nutrition and Health Research, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tinu Mary SamuelJ. Spieldenner and T.M. Samuel are with Public Health Nutrition, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland. I. Silva-Zolezzi is with Nutrition and Health Research, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jörg SpieldennerJ. Spieldenner and T.M. Samuel are with Public Health Nutrition, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland. I. Silva-Zolezzi is with Nutrition and Health Research, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland. jorg.spieldenner@rdls.nestle.com.
Nestlé (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is currently defined as glucose intolerance that is of variable severity with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study, including 25 000 nondiabetic pregnant women in 15 centers across the world, reported that an average of 17.8% of pregnancies are affected by GDM and its frequency can be as high as 25.5% in some countries, based on the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Nevertheless, true global prevalence estimates of GDM are currently lacking due to the high level of heterogeneity in screening approaches, diagnostic criteria, and differences in the characteristics of the populations that were studied. The presence of systemic high blood glucose levels in pregnancy results in an adverse intrauterine environment, which has been shown to have a negative impact on short- and long-term health outcomes for both the mother and her offspring, including increased risks for the infant to develop obesity and for both mother and child to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus later in life. Epigenetic mechanisms that are directly influenced by environmental factors, including nutrition, may play a key role in shaping these future health risks and may be part of this vicious cycle. This article reviews the burden of GDM and the current evidence that supports maternal nutritional interventions as a promising strategy to break the cycle by addressing risk factors associated with GDM.

Indexed as

Maternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBlood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietExerciseFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFemaleHumansHyperglycemiaMicronutrientsObesityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrevalenceProbioticsBlood GlucoseFatty Acids, UnsaturatedMicronutrientsVitamin Dfood fortificationgestational diabetes mellitushyperglycemiamicronutrientnutrition

Identifiers

PMID28049748
PMCPMC5437972
OpenAlexW2561525500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.