Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28049647›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2017

Regulating the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus (SCN) Circadian Clockwork: Interplay between Cell-Autonomous and Circuit-Level Mechanisms.

Erik D Herzog, Tracey Hermanstyne, Nicola J Smyllie, Michael H Hastings

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik D HerzogDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899.
Tracey HermanstyneDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899.
Nicola J SmyllieDivision of Neurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom.
Michael H HastingsDivision of Neurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

CELLULAR BASIS OF CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS IN MAMMALSR01MH063104 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HERZOG, ERIK · 2000 to 2013
$4.2M
MECHANISMS AND MODELING OF NETWORKED CIRCADIAN PACEMAKER SYNCHRONIZATIONR01GM096873 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DOYLE, FRANCIS J, HENSON, MICHAEL · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
Medical Research Council MC_U105170643NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096873NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the principal circadian clock of the brain, directing daily cycles of behavior and physiology. SCN neurons contain a cell-autonomous transcription-based clockwork but, in turn, circuit-level interactions synchronize the 20,000 or so SCN neurons into a robust and coherent daily timer. Synchronization requires neuropeptide signaling, regulated by a reciprocal interdependence between the molecular clockwork and rhythmic electrical activity, which in turn depends on a daytime Na

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksAnimalsHumansNeuronsSuprachiasmatic Nucleus

Identifiers

PMID28049647
PMCPMC5204321
OpenAlexW2560908995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.