Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28049574›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2017

Follow-up care of cancer survivors: challenges and solutions.

Linda A Jacobs, Lawrence N Shulman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03690401 (Assessment of Body Composition in Cancer Patients Post-Treatment Using the SOZO Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 114 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03690401 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Body Composition in Cancer Patients Post-Treatment Using the SOZO Device

TypeobservationalSponsorPrisma Health-UpstateRan2018 to 2023Enrolled52ConditionsCancerArmsSOZO Device, DEXA Scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Longer term patient management following stroke: A systematic review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Breast cancer survivorship in rural settings: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Barriers and facilitators of exercise experienced by cancer survivors: a mixed methods systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Predictors of initial engagement with an asynchronous cognitive behavioral stress management website among older women with nonmetastatic breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  8. Quality of early prostate cancer follow-up care from the patients' perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linda A JacobsDirector for Survivorship Clinical Programs, Research and Educational Initiatives, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: linda.jacobs@uphs.upenn.edu.
Lawrence N ShulmanDeputy Director for Clinical Services, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention to survivors of adult cancers formally began more than 30 years ago with the founding of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship by representatives from 20 organisations who envisioned an organisation that would address survivorship issues and include friends, family, and caregivers. Since then, progress has been made in cancer care delivery, which has created challenges for and barriers to provision of optimal follow-up care to patients and survivors living with cancer as a chronic illness. Focus on post-treatment cancer care, including monitoring for long-term and late effects, and concerns regarding the effect of a cancer diagnosis and treatment on quality of life have gained momentum in the past 10 years. This impetus is largely a result of the 2005 Institute of Medicine Report From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Although the issues raised in the report were hardly novel, they gave a new and powerful voice to the cancer survivorship movement that demanded a call to action. In this Series paper, we provide an overview of the issues surrounding provision of cancer survivorship and follow-up care in the USA and discuss potential solutions to these challenges.

Indexed as

AftercareContinuity of Patient CareSurvivorsAdultHumansNeoplasmsQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID28049574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.