Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28049492›Full record

ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2017

Current status and perspectives of interventional clinical trials for glioblastoma - analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Nikola Cihoric, Alexandros Tsikkinis, Giuseppe Minniti, Frank J Lagerwaard, Ulrich Herrlinger, Etienne Mathier, Ivan Soldatovic, Branislav Jeremic, Pirus Ghadjar, Olgun Elicin and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interval brain imaging for adults with cerebral glioma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Once, Twice, Three Times a Finding: Reproducibility of Dendritic Cell Vaccine Trials Targeting Cytomegalovirus in Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Glioblastoma Clinical Trials: Current Landscape and Opportunities for Improvement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nikola CihoricDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. nikola.cihoric@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-8520
Alexandros TsikkinisDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Giuseppe MinnitiUnit of Radiation Oncology, Sant' Andrea Hospital, University Sapienza, and IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Frank J LagerwaardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ulrich HerrlingerDepartment of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.
Etienne MathierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Ivan SoldatovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Branislav JeremicInstitute of Lung Diseases, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia and BioIRC Center for Biomedical Research, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Pirus GhadjarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Olgun ElicinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Kristina LösslDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Evelyn HerrmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The records of 208.777 (100%) clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov were downloaded on the 19th of February 2016. Phase II and III trials including patients with glioblastoma were selected for further classification and analysis. Based on the disease settings, trials were classified into three groups: newly diagnosed glioblastoma, recurrent disease and trials with no differentiation according to disease setting. Furthermore, we categorized trials according to the experimental interventions, the primary sponsor, the source of financial support and trial design elements. Trends were evaluated using the autoregressive integrated moving average model. Two hundred sixteen (0.1%) trials were selected for further analysis. Academic centers (investigator initiated trials) were recorded as primary sponsors in 56.9% of trials, followed by industry 25.9%. Industry was the leading source of monetary support for the selected trials in 44.4%, followed by 25% of trials with primarily academic financial support. The number of newly initiated trials between 2005 and 2015 shows a positive trend, mainly through an increase in phase II trials, whereas phase III trials show a negative trend. The vast majority of trials evaluate forms of different systemic treatments (91.2%). In total, one hundred different molecular entities or biologicals were identified. Of those, 60% were involving drugs specifically designed for central nervous system malignancies. Trials that specifically address radiotherapy, surgery, imaging and other therapeutic or diagnostic methods appear to be rare. Current research in glioblastoma is mainly driven or sponsored by industry, academic medical oncologists and neuro-oncologists, with the majority of trials evaluating forms of systemic therapies. Few trials reach phase III. Imaging, radiation therapy and surgical procedures are underrepresented in current trials portfolios. Optimization in research portfolio for glioblastoma is needed.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicGlioblastomaHumansResearch DesignClinicaltrials.govGlioblastomaInterventional Clinical Trials

Identifiers

PMID28049492
PMCPMC5210306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.