ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2017
Influence of exposure differences on city-to-city heterogeneity in PM
Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outdoor air pollutants and asthma risk in adolescents: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Oxidative Potential Versus Biological Effects: A Review on the Relevance of Cell-Free/Abiotic Assays as Predictors of Toxicity from Airborne Particulate Matter.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Modeling Traffic-Related Air Pollution Burden of Disease using High Spatial Resolution Data.Journal of transport & health · 2025Article
- Mortality and morbidity assessment attributed to short- and long-term exposure to fine particles in ambient air of Agadir city, Morocco: The AirQ model approach.Environmental analysis, health and toxicology · 2023Article
- Effect modification of consecutive high concentration days on the association between fine particulate matter and mortality: a multi-city study in Korea.Epidemiology and health · 2022Article
- Exploration of PM mass, source, and component-related factors that might explain heterogeneity in daily PMAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994) · 2021Article
- A framework for estimating the US mortality burden of fine particulate matter exposure attributable to indoor and outdoor microenvironments.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2020Article
- Comparison of Short-Term Associations between PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Association between PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Association of ambient Particulate matter 2.5 with intensive care unit admission due to pneumonia: a distributed lag non-linear model.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Selective ATP-Binding Cassette Subfamily C Gene Expression and Proinflammatory Mediators Released by BEAS-2B after PMMediators of inflammation · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMulti-city population-based epidemiological studies have observed heterogeneity between city-specific fine particulate matter (PM
methodsThe objective of this analysis is to evaluate whether previously developed residential infiltration-based city clusters can explain city-to-city heterogeneity in PM
resultsAssociations between a 2-day (lag 0-1 days) moving average of PM
conclusionsThis is the first study that attempted to examine whether multiple exposure factors could explain the heterogeneity in PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.