Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28049472›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Implementation of a recovery-oriented model in a sub-acute Intermediate Stay Mental Health Unit (ISMHU).

Barry G Frost, Megan Turrell, Ketrina A Sly, Terry J Lewin, Agatha M Conrad, Suzanne Johnston, Srinivasan Tirupati, Kerry Petrovic, Sadanand Rajkumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barry G FrostSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Megan TurrellHunter New England Mental Health, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.
Ketrina A SlyCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Terry J LewinCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Terry.Lewin@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.
Agatha M ConradCentre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Suzanne JohnstonHunter New England Mental Health, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.
Srinivasan TirupatiHunter New England Mental Health, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.
Kerry PetrovicNurse Unit Manager (2010-2015), ISMHU, Hunter New England Mental Health, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.
Sadanand RajkumarHunter New England Mental Health, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn ongoing service evaluation project was initiated following the establishment of a new, purpose-built, 20-bed sub-acute Intermediate Stay Mental Health Unit (ISMHU). This paper: provides an overview of the targeted 6-week program, operating within an Integrated Recovery-oriented Model (IRM); characterises the clients admitted during the first 16 months; and documents their recovery needs and any changes.

methodsA brief description of the unit's establishment and programs is initially provided. Client needs and priorities were identified collaboratively using the Mental Health Recovery Star (MHRS) and addressed through a range of in-situ, individual and group interventions. Extracted client and service data were analysed using descriptive statistics, paired t-tests examining change from admission to discharge, and selected correlations.

resultsThe initial 154 clients (165 admissions, average stay = 47.86 days) were predominately male (72.1%), transferred from acute care (75.3%), with schizophrenia or related disorders (74.0%). Readmission rates within 6-months were 16.2% for acute and 3.2% for sub-acute care. Three MHRS subscales were derived, together with stage-of-change categories. Marked improvements in MHRS Symptom management and functioning were identified (z-change = -1.15), followed by Social-connection (z-change = -0.82) and Self-belief (z-change = -0.76). This was accompanied by a mean reduction of 2.59 in the number of pre-action MHRS items from admission to discharge (z-change = 0.98). Clinician-rated Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) improvements were smaller (z-change = 0.41), indicative of illness chronicity. Staff valued the elements of client choice, the holistic and team approach, program quality, review processes and opportunities for client change. Addressing high-levels of need in the 6-week timeframe was raised as a concern.

conclusionsThis paper demonstrates that a recovery-oriented model can be successfully implemented at the intermediate level of care. It is hoped that ongoing evaluations support the enthusiasm, commitment and feedback evident from staff, clients and carers.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesAdultCaregiversDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMental DisordersPatient DischargeResidential FacilitiesSubacute CareHealth service evaluationInpatientsMental disordersMental health servicesRecoveryRehabilitationSerious mental illnessSub-acute

Identifiers

PMID28049472
PMCPMC5210223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.