Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28049469›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2017

DISCONTOOLS: a database to identify research gaps on vaccines, pharmaceuticals and diagnostics for the control of infectious diseases of animals.

Declan O'Brien, Jim Scudamore, Johannes Charlier, Morgane Delavergne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Animal health and welfare surveillance priorities for the Canadian beef industry.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Declan O'BrienInternational Federation for Animal Health Europe, Avenue de Tervueren 168, box 8, 1150, Brussels, Belgium. declanjobrien@hotmail.com.
Jim ScudamoreInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Johannes CharlierAvia-GIS, Risschotlei 33, 2980, Zoersel, Belgium.
Morgane DelavergneInternational Federation for Animal Health Europe, Avenue de Tervueren 168, box 8, 1150, Brussels, Belgium.
Avia-GIS (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe public and private sector in the EU spend around €800 million per year on animal health and welfare related research. An objective process to identify critical gaps in knowledge and available control tools should aid the prioritisation of research in order to speed up the development of new or improved diagnostics, vaccines and pharmaceuticals and reduce the burden of animal diseases.

methodHere, we describe the construction of a database based on expert consultation for 52 infectious diseases of animals.

resultsFor each disease, an expert group produced a disease and product analysis document that formed the basis for gap analysis and prioritisation. The prioritisation model was based on a closed scoring system, employing identical weights for six evaluation criteria (disease knowledge; impact on animal health and welfare; impact on public health; impact on wider society; impact on trade; control tools). The diseases were classified into three groups: epizootic diseases, food-producing animal complexes or zoonotic diseases. DISCUSSION: The highly ranked diseases in the prioritisation model comprised mostly zoonotic and epizootic diseases with important gaps identified in vaccine development and pharmaceuticals, respectively. The most important outcome is the identification of key research needs by disease. The rankings and research needs by disease are provided on a public website ( www.discontools.eu ) which is currently being updated based on new expert consultations.

conclusionAs such, it can become a reference point for funders of research including the European Commission, member states, foundations, trusts along with private industry to prioritise research. This will deliver benefits in terms of animal health and welfare but also public health, societal benefits and a safe and secure food supply.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualVeterinary DrugsAnimal DiseasesAnimalsCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicable DiseasesDecision Support TechniquesDisease OutbreaksDisease Transmission, InfectiousEuropeResearchVaccinesVeterinary MedicineVaccinesVeterinary DrugsAnimal diseaseEUPrioritisationResearch needs

Identifiers

PMID28049469
PMCPMC5209808
OpenAlexW2565665981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.