ArticleBMC public health2017
Identifying mechanisms for facilitating knowledge to action strategies targeting the built environment.
Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strengthening complex systems for chronic disease prevention: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2019Pooled it
- Clinical Presentation, Angiographic Characteristics, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Young Adults Undergoing Coronary Angiography in a Resource-Limited Sub-Saharan Setting.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Partitioning and probe-based quantitative PCR assays for the wastewater monitoring ofJournal of water and health · 2025Article
- Imagining and implementing healthy city interventions: Combined results from parallel concept mapping exercises in Montreal with community members and stakeholders.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024Article
- Personal determinants of change agents' decision-making behavior in community health promotion: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Built environment stakeholders' experiences of implementing healthy urban development: an exploratory study.Cities & health · 2022Article
- Sharing believable stories: A qualitative study exploring the relevance of case studies for influencing the creation of healthy environments.Health & place · 2021Article
- Priorities and Indicators for Economic Evaluation of Built Environment Interventions to Promote Physical Activity.Journal of physical activity & health · 2021Article
- Expanding Implementation Research to Prevent Chronic Diseases in Community Settings.Annual review of public health · 2021Review
- Relationship-building around a policy decision-support tool for urban health.Buildings & cities · 2021Article
- Neighborhood walkability and pre-diabetes incidence in a multiethnic population.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Article
- Organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- Diabetes and the Built Environment: Evidence and Policies.Current diabetes reports · 2019Review
- Area-Level Walkability and the Geographic Distribution of High Body Mass in Sydney, Australia: A Spatial Analysis Using the 45 and Up Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, obesity-related diseases have been on the rise globally resulting in major challenges for health systems and society as a whole. Emerging research in population health suggests that interventions targeting the built environment may help reduce the burden of obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, translation of the evidence on the built environment into effective policy and planning changes requires engagement and collaboration between multiple sectors and government agencies for designing neighborhoods that are more conducive to healthy and active living. In this study, we identified knowledge gaps and other barriers to evidence-based decision-making and policy development related to the built environment; as well as the infrastructure, processes, and mechanisms needed to drive policy changes in this area.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of data collected through consultations with a broad group of stakeholders (N = 42) from Southern Ontario, Canada, within various sectors (public health, urban planning, and transportation) and levels of government (federal, provincial, and municipalities). Relevant themes were classified based on the specific phase of the knowledge-to-action cycle (research, translation, and implementation) in which they were most closely aligned.
resultsWe identified 5 themes including: 1) the need for policy-informed and actionable research (e.g. health economic analyses and policy evaluations); 2) impactful messaging that targets all relevant sectors to create the political will necessary to drive policy change; 3) common measures and tools to increase capacity for monitoring and surveillance of built environment changes; (4) intersectoral collaboration and alignment within and between levels of government to enable collective actions and provide mechanisms for sharing of resources and expertise, (5) aligning public and private sector priorities to generate public demand and support for community action; and, (6) solution-focused implementation of research that will be tailored to meet the needs of policymakers and planners. Additional research priorities and key policy and planning actions were also noted.
conclusionOur research highlights the necessity of involving stakeholders in identifying inter-sectoral solutions to develop and translate actionable research on the built environment into effective policy and planning initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.