Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28049452›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

Waiting time for cancer treatment and mental health among patients with newly diagnosed esophageal or gastric cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Huan Song, Fang Fang, Unnur Valdimarsdóttir, Donghao Lu, Therese M-L Andersson, Christina Hultman, Weimin Ye, Lars Lundell, Jan Johansson, Magnus Nilsson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors contributing to delays in initiation of front-line cervical cancer therapy: disparities in a diverse south Florida population.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prognostic factors affecting long-term outcomes in patients with brain metastasis from esophageal carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Improvements in esophageal and gastric cancer care in Sweden-population-based results 2007-2016 from a national quality register.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2020
    Article
  18. Impact of preoperative wait time on survival in patients with clinical stage II/III gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Huan SongDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, SE171 77, Sweden. huan.song@ki.se.
Fang FangDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, SE171 77, Sweden.
Unnur ValdimarsdóttirDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, SE171 77, Sweden.
Donghao LuDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, SE171 77, Sweden.
Therese M-L AnderssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, SE171 77, Sweden.
Christina HultmanDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, SE171 77, Sweden.
Weimin YeDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, SE171 77, Sweden.
Lars LundellDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan JohanssonDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Magnus NilssonDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats LindbladDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcept for overall survival, whether or not waiting time for treatment could influences other domains of cancer patients' overall well-being is to a large extent unknown. Therefore, we performed this study to determine the effect of waiting time for cancer treatment on the mental health of patients with esophageal or gastric cancer.

methodsBased on the Swedish National Quality Register for Esophageal and Gastric Cancers (NREV), we followed 7,080 patients diagnosed 2006-2012 from the time of treatment decision. Waiting time for treatment was defined as the interval between diagnosis and treatment decision, and was classified into quartiles. Mental disorders were identified by either clinical diagnosis through hospital visit or prescription of psychiatric medications. For patients without any mental disorder before treatment, the association between waiting time and subsequent onset of mental disorders was assessed by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI), derived from multivariable-adjusted Cox model. For patients with a preexisting mental disorder, we compared the rate of psychiatric care by different waiting times, allowing for repeated events.

resultsAmong 4,120 patients without any preexisting mental disorder, lower risk of new onset mental disorders was noted for patients with longer waiting times, i.e. 18-29 days (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74-1.00) and 30-60 days (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67-0.93) as compared with 9-17 days. Among 2,312 patients with preexisting mental disorders, longer waiting time was associated with more frequent psychiatric hospital care during the first year after treatment (37.5% higher rate per quartile increase in waiting time; p for trend = 0.0002). However, no such association was observed beyond one year nor for the prescription of psychiatric medications.

conclusionsThese data suggest that waiting time to treatment for esophageal or gastric cancer may have different mental health consequences for patients depending on their past psychiatric vulnerabilities. Our study sheds further light on the complexity of waiting time management, and calls for a comprehensive strategy that takes into account different domains of patient well-being in addition to the overall survival.

Indexed as

Time-to-TreatmentAgedCohort StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMental DisordersMental HealthNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRegistriesStomach NeoplasmsSwedenCancer treatmentCohort studyEsophageal cancerGastric cancerMental disorderWaiting time

Identifiers

PMID28049452
PMCPMC5209901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.