Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28049135›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2018

Design of RNAs: comparing programs for inverse RNA folding.

Alexander Churkin, Matan Drory Retwitzer, Vladimir Reinharz, Yann Ponty, Jérôme Waldispühl, Danny Barash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. gRNAde: Geometric Deep Learning for 3D RNA inverse design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Riboswitch Design Using MODENA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Toward Increasing the Credibility of RNA Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Sequence Design Using RNAstructure.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  17. gRNAde: A Geometric Deep Learning Pipeline for 3D RNA Inverse Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander ChurkinShamoon College of Engineering and Physics Department at Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Matan Drory RetwitzerDepartment of Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Vladimir ReinharzDepartment of Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Yann PontyLaboratoire d'informatique, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
Jérôme WaldispühlSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montréal QC, Canada.
Danny BarashDepartment of Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational programs for predicting RNA sequences with desired folding properties have been extensively developed and expanded in the past several years. Given a secondary structure, these programs aim to predict sequences that fold into a target minimum free energy secondary structure, while considering various constraints. This procedure is called inverse RNA folding. Inverse RNA folding has been traditionally used to design optimized RNAs with favorable properties, an application that is expected to grow considerably in the future in light of advances in the expanding new fields of synthetic biology and RNA nanostructures. Moreover, it was recently demonstrated that inverse RNA folding can successfully be used as a valuable preprocessing step in computational detection of novel noncoding RNAs. This review describes the most popular freeware programs that have been developed for such purposes, starting from RNAinverse that was devised when formulating the inverse RNA folding problem. The most recently published ones that consider RNA secondary structure as input are antaRNA, RNAiFold and incaRNAfbinv, each having different features that could be beneficial to specific biological problems in practice. The various programs also use distinct approaches, ranging from ant colony optimization to constraint programming, in addition to adaptive walk, simulated annealing and Boltzmann sampling. This review compares between the various programs and provides a simple description of the various possibilities that would benefit practitioners in selecting the most suitable program. It is geared for specific tasks requiring RNA design based on input secondary structure, with an outlook toward the future of RNA design programs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNucleic Acid ConformationRNA FoldingSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansModels, MolecularRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID28049135
PMCPMC6018860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.