Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28046038›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Species Delimitation and Phylogenetic Relationships in Ectobiid Cockroaches (Dictyoptera, Blattodea) from China.

Yanli Che, Shunhua Gui, Nathan Lo, Andrew Ritchie, Zongqing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Six new species ofZooKeys · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Redescription ofZooKeys · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New record ofZooKeys · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The cockroach genusZooKeys · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanli CheCollege of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Shunhua GuiCollege of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Nathan LoSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrew RitchieSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Zongqing WangCollege of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6295-7372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We collected Ectobiidae cockroach specimens from 44 locations in the south of the Yangtze valley. We obtained 297 COI sequences specimens and carried out phylogenetic and divergence dating analyses, as well as species delimitation analysis using a General Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) framework. The intraspecific and interspecific sequence divergence in Ectobiidae cockroaches ranged from 0.0 to 7.0% and 4.6 to 30.8%, respectively. GMYC analysis resulted in 53 (confidence interval: 37-65) entities (likelihood ratio = 103.63) including 14 downloaded species. The COI GMYC groups partly corresponded to the ectobiid species and 52 ectobiid species were delimited successfully based on the combination of GMYC result with morphological information. We used the molecular data and 6 cockroach fossil calibrations to obtain a preliminary estimate of the timescale of ectobiid evolution. The major subfamilies in the group were found to have diverged between ~125-110 Ma, and morphospecies pairs were found to have diverged ~10 or more Ma.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsBase SequenceBlattellidaeChinaElectron Transport Complex IVGenetic VariationGeographyLikelihood FunctionsSpecies SpecificityElectron Transport Complex IV

Identifiers

PMID28046038
PMCPMC5207705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.