Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28046026›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Comparison of In-Vitro and Ex-Vivo Wound Healing Assays for the Investigation of Diabetic Wound Healing and Demonstration of a Beneficial Effect of a Triterpene Extract.

Christopher Ueck, Thomas Volksdorf, Pia Houdek, Sabine Vidal-Y-Sy, Susanne Sehner, Bernhard Ellinger, Ralf Lobmann, Axel Larena-Avellaneda, Konrad Reinshagen, Ina Ridderbusch and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. [New progress in the treatment of chronic wound of diabetic foot].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christopher UeckUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas VolksdorfUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Hamburg, Germany.
Pia HoudekUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Hamburg, Germany.
Sabine Vidal-Y-SyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Hamburg, Germany.
Susanne SehnerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg, Germany.
Bernhard EllingerFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, ScreeningPort, Hamburg, Germany.
Ralf LobmannKlinikum Stuttgart, Department for Endocrinology, Diabetology and Geriatrics, Stuttgart, Germany.
Axel Larena-AvellanedaUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Vascular Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Konrad ReinshagenUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department and Clinic of Pediatric Surgery, Hamburg, Germany.
Ina RidderbuschUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department and Clinic of Pediatric Surgery, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaas KohrmeyerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Hamburg, Germany.
Ingrid MollUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Hamburg, Germany.
Rolf DanielsEberhard Karls University Tübingen, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Tübingen, Germany.
Philipp WernerAlbert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Department of Pharmaceutical Biology and Biotechnology, Freiburg, Germany.
Irmgard MerfortAlbert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Department of Pharmaceutical Biology and Biotechnology, Freiburg, Germany.
Johanna M BrandnerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a frequent cause for chronic, difficult-to-treat wounds. New therapies for diabetic wounds are urgently needed and in-vitro or ex-vivo test systems are essential for the initial identification of new active molecules. The aim of this study is to compare in-vitro and ex-vivo test systems for their usability for early drug screening and to investigate the efficacy of a birch bark triterpene extract (TE) that has been proven ex-vivo and clinically to accelerate non-diabetic wound healing (WH), in a diabetic context. We investigated in-vitro models for diabetic WH, i.e. scratch assays with human keratinocytes from diabetic donors or cultured under hyperglycaemic conditions and a newly developed porcine ex-vivo hyperglycaemic WH model for their potential to mimic delayed diabetic WH and for the influence of TE in these test systems. We show that keratinocytes from diabetic donors often fail to exhibit significantly delayed WH. For cells under hyperglycaemic conditions significant decrease is observed but is influenced by choice of medium and presence of supplements. Also, donor age plays a role. Interestingly, hyperglycaemic effects are mainly hyperosmolaric effects in scratch assays. Ex-vivo models under hyperglycaemic conditions show a clear and substantial decrease of WH, and here both glucose and hyperosmolarity effects are involved. Finally, we provide evidence that TE is also beneficial for ex-vivo hyperglycaemic WH, resulting in significantly increased length of regenerated epidermis to 188±16% and 183±11% (SEM; p<0.05) compared to controls when using two different TE formulations. In conclusion, our results suggest that microenvironmental influences are important in WH test systems and that therefore the more complex hyperglycaemic ex-vivo model is more suitable for early drug screening. Limitations of the in-vitro and ex-vivo models are discussed. Furthermore our data recommend TE as a promising candidate for in-vivo testings in diabetic wounds.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsChild, PreschoolCytokinesDiabetes MellitusEpitheliumFemaleFibroblastsGlucoseHumansHyperglycemiaKeratinocytesMaleSus scrofaCytokinesGlucoseTriterpenes

Identifiers

PMID28046026
PMCPMC5207624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.