Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28045939›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Association of Occupational and Leisure-Time Physical Activity with Aerobic Capacity in a Working Population.

Jonas Mundwiler, Ulla Schüpbach, Thomas Dieterle, Jörg Daniel Leuppi, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss, David Paul Wolfer, David Miedinger, Stefanie Brighenti-Zogg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas MundwilerUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Ulla SchüpbachUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Thomas DieterleUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Jörg Daniel LeuppiUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Arno Schmidt-TrucksässDepartment of Sport Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
David Paul WolferDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
David MiedingerFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefanie Brighenti-ZoggUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHETH Zurich · CHSuva · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObjective data on the association of maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) with work related physical activity are sparse. Thus, it is not clear whether occupational physical activity (OPA) contributes to an increase of VO2max. This study examined the association of VO2max with work and non-work related physical activity in a Swiss working population.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a total of 337 healthy and full-time employed adults were recruited. Demographic data, height, weight and BMI were recorded in all subjects. Participants were classified into nine occupational categories (ISCO-88) and merged into three groups with low, moderate, and high OPA. Physical activity was objectively measured by the SenseWear Mini Armband on seven consecutive days (23 hours per day). Participants were regarded as sufficiently active when accumulating ≥30 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day. VO2max was evaluated using the multistage 20-meter shuttle run test.

resultsData of 303 participants were considered for analysis (63% male, age 33 yrs, SD 12). Multiple linear regression analysis (adjusted R2 = 0.69) revealed significant positive associations of VO2max with leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) at vigorous intensity (β = 0.212) and sufficient moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (β = 0.100) on workdays. Female gender (β = -0.622), age (β = -0.264), BMI (β = -0.220), the ratio of maximum to resting heart rate (β = 0.192), occupational group (low vs. high OPA, β = -0.141), and smoking (β = -0.133) were also identified as independent predictors of VO2max.

conclusionsThe present results suggest that VO2max is positively associated with LTPA, but not with OPA on workdays. This finding emphasizes the need for employees to engage in sufficient high-intensity physical activity in recreation for maintaining or improving VO2max with regard to health benefits.

Indexed as

EmploymentExerciseExercise ToleranceLeisure ActivitiesPhysical FitnessAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexBody WeightCross-Sectional StudiesExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28045939
PMCPMC5207528
OpenAlexW2568054921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.