Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28045913›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2017

Artificially Sweetened Beverages and the Response to the Global Obesity Crisis.

Maria Carolina Borges, Maria Laura Louzada, Thiago Hérick de Sá, Anthony A Laverty, Diana C Parra, Josefa Maria Fellegger Garzillo, Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Christopher Millett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The benefits and challenges of taxing sugar in a small island state: an interrupted time series analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Carolina BorgesPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7785-4547
Maria Laura LouzadaDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago Hérick de SáDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-4483
Anthony A LavertyPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Diana C ParraWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Program in Physical Therapy, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-6231
Josefa Maria Fellegger GarzilloDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-5134
Carlos Augusto MonteiroDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Christopher MillettCenter for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Department of Health RP_2014-04-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Christopher Millett and colleagues argue that artificially sweetened beverages should not be promoted as part of a healthy diet.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyGlobal HealthBeveragesHumansObesitySweetening AgentsSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID28045913
PMCPMC5207632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.