Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28045801›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2017

Physical Employment Standards for UK Firefighters: Minimum Muscular Strength and Endurance Requirements.

Richard D M Stevenson, Andrew G Siddall, Philip F J Turner, James L J Bilzon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Justified Concerns? An Exploration of the Leg Tuck in a Tactical Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Development of muscle mass and body fat reference curves for white male UK firefighters.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard D M StevensonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath (Mr Stevenson, Dr Siddall, Mr Turner, Dr Bilzon); Occupational Health Services, South Wales Fire & Rescue Service, Cardiff, Wales (Mr Stevenson); and Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service, Preston, Lancashire, UK (Mr Stevenson, Turner).
Andrew G Siddall
Philip F J Turner
James L J Bilzon
University of Bath · GBCreative Commons · USStevenson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess sensitivity and specificity of surrogate physical ability tests as predictors of criterion firefighting task performance and to identify corresponding minimum muscular strength and endurance standards.

methodsFifty-one (26 male; 25 female) participants completed three criterion tasks (ladder lift, ladder lower, ladder extension) and three corresponding surrogate tests [one-repetition maximum (1RM) seated shoulder press; 1RM seated rope pull-down; repeated 28 kg seated rope pull-down]. Surrogate test standards were calculated that best identified individuals who passed (sensitivity; true positives) and failed (specificity; true negatives) criterion tasks.

resultsBest sensitivity/specificity achieved were 1.00/1.00 for a 35 kg seated shoulder press, 0.79/0.92 for a 60 kg rope pull-down, and 0.83/0.93 for 23 repetitions of the 28 kg rope pull-down.

conclusionsThese standards represent performance on surrogate tests commensurate with minimum acceptable performance of essential strength-based occupational tasks in UK firefighters.

Indexed as

FirefightersMuscle StrengthPhysical EnduranceAdolescentAdultEmploymentExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleSensitivity and SpecificityUnited KingdomWork Capacity EvaluationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28045801
PMCPMC5704671
OpenAlexW2558948397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.