Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28045455›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2017

The Pseudomonas putida T6SS is a plant warden against phytopathogens.

Patricia Bernal, Luke P Allsopp, Alain Filloux, María A Llamas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Plant-Endophyte Cross-Talk inMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Virulence regulation in the fish pathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  17. Mechanisms ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Effect ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patricia BernalMRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Luke P AllsoppMRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alain FillouxMRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1307-0289
María A LlamasDepartment of Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental del Zaidín-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Granada, Spain.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N002539/1Medical Research Council MR/J006874/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial type VI secretion systems (T6SSs) are molecular weapons designed to deliver toxic effectors into prey cells. These nanomachines have an important role in inter-bacterial competition and provide advantages to T6SS active strains in polymicrobial environments. Here we analyze the genome of the biocontrol agent Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and identify three T6SS gene clusters (K1-, K2- and K3-T6SS). Besides, 10 T6SS effector-immunity pairs were found, including putative nucleases and pore-forming colicins. We show that the K1-T6SS is a potent antibacterial device, which secretes a toxic Rhs-type effector Tke2. Remarkably, P. putida eradicates a broad range of bacteria in a K1-T6SS-dependent manner, including resilient phytopathogens, which demonstrates that the T6SS is instrumental to empower P. putida to fight against competitors. Furthermore, we observed a drastically reduced necrosis on the leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana during co-infection with P. putida and Xanthomonas campestris. Such protection is dependent on the activity of the P. putida T6SS. Many routes have been explored to develop biocontrol agents capable of manipulating the microbial composition of the rhizosphere and phyllosphere. Here we unveil a novel mechanism for plant biocontrol, which needs to be considered for the selection of plant wardens whose mission is to prevent phytopathogen infections.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBiological Control AgentsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialNicotianaPlant DiseasesPseudomonas putidaType VI Secretion SystemsXanthomonas campestrisBacterial ProteinsBiological Control AgentsType VI Secretion Systems

Identifiers

PMID28045455
PMCPMC5363822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.