ArticleHuman brain mapping2017
On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive science theory-driven pharmacology elucidates the neurobiological basis of perception-motor integration.Communications biology · 2022Trial
- When two is worse than one: The deleterious impact of multisensory stimulation on response inhibition.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Perpendicular neuromorphic channels facilitate lateral inhibition for tactile location.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cross-Modal Transfer Effects of the Go/No-Go Training With Visual Stimuli.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Cortical oscillations and event-related brain potentials during the preparation and execution of deceptive behavior.Psychophysiology · 2024Article
- Alpha and theta band activity share information relevant to proactive and reactive control during conflict-modulated response inhibition.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Action Postponing and Restraint Varies among Sensory Modalities.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Resting-state theta activity is linked to information content-specific coding levels during response inhibition.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Backward Inhibition and Deinhibition: A Review.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Review
- Neurophysiological correlates of perception-action binding in the somatosensory system.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Auditory and Visual Response Inhibition in Children with Bilateral Hearing Aids and Children with ADHD.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Low and high stimulation frequencies differentially affect automated response selection in the superior parietal cortex - implications for somatosensory area processes.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Neural Basis of Extremely High Temporal Sensitivity: Insights From a Patient With Autism.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- On the relevance of EEG resting theta activity for the neurophysiological dynamics underlying motor inhibitory control.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- How the depth of processing modulates emotional interference - evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- The neurophysiological basis of developmental changes during sequential cognitive flexibility between adolescents and adults.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual-attentional conflicts during auditory processing.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Paradoxical, causal effects of sensory gain modulation on motor inhibitory control - a tDCS, EEG-source localization study.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Machine learning provides novel neurophysiological features that predict performance to inhibit automated responses.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Differences in response inhibition processes between adolescents and adults are modulated by sensory processes.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to inhibit responses is a central sensorimotor function but only recently the importance of sensory processes for motor inhibition mechanisms went more into the research focus. In this regard it is elusive, whether there are differences between sensory modalities to trigger response inhibition processes. Due to functional neuroanatomical considerations strong differences may exist, for example, between the visual and the tactile modality. In the current study we examine what neurophysiological mechanisms as well as functional neuroanatomical networks are modulated during response inhibition. Therefore, a Go/NoGo-paradigm employing a novel combination of visual, tactile, and visuotactile stimuli was used. The data show that the tactile modality is more powerful than the visual modality to trigger response inhibition processes. However, the tactile modality loses its efficacy to trigger response inhibition processes when being combined with the visual modality. This may be due to competitive mechanisms leading to a suppression of certain sensory stimuli and the response selection level. Variations in sensory modalities specifically affected conflict monitoring processes during response inhibition by modulating activity in a frontal parietal network including the right inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex and the temporoparietal junction. Attentional selection processes are not modulated. The results suggest that the functional neuroanatomical networks involved in response inhibition critically depends on the nature of the sensory input. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1941-1951, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.