Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28045137›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2017

The effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on small intestinal barrier function and mucosal gene transcription; a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial.

Zlatan Mujagic, Paul de Vos, Mark V Boekschoten, Coen Govers, Harm-Jan H M Pieters, Nicole J W de Wit, Peter A Bron, Ad A M Masclee, Freddy J Troost

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Safety ofNutrients · 2026
    Trial
  4. Efficacy and dose response ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Gut microbes
    Trial
  9. From pain relief to mucosal grief: A comprehensive review of NSAID enteropathy.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. SalivaryDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zlatan MujagicTop Institute Food &Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Paul de VosTop Institute Food &Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mark V BoekschotenTop Institute Food &Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Coen GoversTop Institute Food &Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Harm-Jan H M PietersDivision Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nicole J W de WitFood &Biobased Research, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Peter A BronTop Institute Food &Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ad A M MascleeDivision Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Freddy J TroostTop Institute Food &Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Food & Nutrition · NLMaastricht University · NLWageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three Lactobacillus plantarum strains on in-vivo small intestinal barrier function and gut mucosal gene transcription in human subjects. The strains were selected for their differential effects on TLR signalling and tight junction protein rearrangement, which may lead to beneficial effects in a stressed human gut mucosa. Ten healthy volunteers participated in four different intervention periods: 7-day oral intake of either L. plantarum WCFS1, CIP104448, TIFN101 or placebo, proceeded by a 4 weeks wash-out period. Lactulose-rhamnose ratio (an indicator of small intestinal permeability) increased after intake of indomethacin, which was given as an artificial stressor of the gut mucosal barrier (mean ratio 0.06 ± 0.04 to 0.10 ± 0.06, p = 0.001), but was not significantly affected by the bacterial interventions. However, analysis in small intestinal biopsies, obtained by gastroduodenoscopy, demonstrated that particularly L. plantarum TIFN101 modulated gene transcription pathways related to cell-cell adhesion with high turnover of genes involved in tight- and adhesion junction protein synthesis and degradation (e.g. actinin alpha-4, metalloproteinase-2). These effects were less pronounced for L. plantarum WCFS1 and CIP104448. In conclusion, L. plantarum TIFN101 induced the most pronounced probiotic properties with specific gene transcriptional effects on repair processes in the compromised intestine of healthy subjects.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAdultBiopsyDouble-Blind MethodDuodenoscopyFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHealthy VolunteersHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestine, SmallLactiplantibacillus plantarumLactuloseMaleMiddle AgedPlacebosGastrointestinal AgentsLactulosePlacebosRhamnose

Identifiers

PMID28045137
PMCPMC5206730
OpenAlexW2566614413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.