Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28045082›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The cellular magnetic response and biocompatibility of biogenic zinc- and cobalt-doped magnetite nanoparticles.

Sandhya Moise, Eva Céspedes, Dalibor Soukup, James M Byrne, Alicia J El Haj, Neil D Telling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Zinc/Cerium-Substituted Magnetite Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Bone Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Hope for bone regeneration: The versatility of iron oxide nanoparticles.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandhya MoiseSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
Eva CéspedesInstitute for Science and Technology in Medicine (ISTM), Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 7QB, United Kingdom.
Dalibor SoukupInstitute for Science and Technology in Medicine (ISTM), Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 7QB, United Kingdom.
James M ByrneCentre for Applied Geoscience (ZAG), University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen 72076, Germany.
Alicia J El HajInstitute for Science and Technology in Medicine (ISTM), Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 7QB, United Kingdom.
Neil D TellingInstitute for Science and Technology in Medicine (ISTM), Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 7QB, United Kingdom.
Keele University · GBIMDEA Nanoscience · ESUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnetic moment and anisotropy of magnetite nanoparticles can be optimised by doping with transition metal cations, enabling their properties to be tuned for different biomedical applications. In this study, we assessed the suitability of bacterially synthesized zinc- and cobalt-doped magnetite nanoparticles for biomedical applications. To do this we measured cellular viability and activity in primary human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and human osteosarcoma-derived cells. Using AC susceptibility we studied doping induced changes in the magnetic response of the nanoparticles both as stable aqueous suspensions and when associated with cells. Our findings show that the magnetic response of the particles was altered after cellular interaction with a reduction in their mobility. In particular, the strongest AC susceptibility signal measured in vitro was from cells containing high-moment zinc-doped particles, whilst no signal was observed in cells containing the high-anisotropy cobalt-doped particles. For both particle types we found that the moderate dopant levels required for optimum magnetic properties did not alter their cytotoxicity or affect osteogenic differentiation of the stem cells. Thus, despite the known cytotoxicity of cobalt and zinc ions, these results suggest that iron oxide nanoparticles can be doped to sufficiently tailor their magnetic properties without compromising cellular biocompatibility.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone Marrow CellsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCobaltFerric CompoundsHumansMagneticsMagnetite NanoparticlesMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisParticle SizeZincBiocompatible MaterialsCobaltFerric Compoundsferric oxideMagnetite NanoparticlesZinc

Identifiers

PMID28045082
PMCPMC5206667
OpenAlexW2567196260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.