ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2017
Serial quantitative magnetic resonance angiography follow-up of renal artery dimensions following treatment by four different renal denervation systems.
Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of intravascular imaging in optimizing renal denervation outcomes.Cardiology journal · 2026Review
- Renal denervation for treatment of hypertension - will 2017 be the year of enlightenment?EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsRenal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is being studied as a therapeutic option for patients with therapy-resistant hypertension. It remains unclear if the procedure affects the renal arteries in such a way that luminal narrowing might occur at the mid to longer term. The aim of the present study was to assess renal artery integrity accurately at the medium to long term using recently validated quantitative magnetic resonance angiography software in patients treated with four different RDN devices. METHODS AND
resultsIn a prospective cohort of 27 patients referred for RDN, quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) was used to assess 52 vessels at baseline, six, and 12 months post treatment with one of four different devices. No renal artery stenosis was seen at six or 12 months. The average mean lumen area was 26.6±7.3 mm2 at baseline versus 25.0±7.1 mm² and 25.0±6.1 mm² at six and 12 months, respectively, resulting in a late loss of 1.6 mm2 at six months and 1.9 mm2 at 12 months. No differences were observed in the arterial response to RDN with the four different systems used. There was no correlation between post-procedural dissections, oedema or thrombi as detected with invasive imaging, and luminal narrowing at follow-up.
conclusionsQuantitative MRA of patients treated with RDN revealed no significant change in renal artery dimensions up to 12-month follow-up. The lack of a change in renal artery luminal dimensions was irrespective of the arterial response to the individual devices used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28044984What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.