Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28044390›Full record

ArticleMolecular reproduction and development2017

Systematic in vitro and in vivo characterization of Leukemia-inhibiting factor- and Fibroblast growth factor-derived porcine induced pluripotent stem cells.

Jan O Secher, Ahmet Ceylan, Gianluca Mazzoni, Kaveh Mashayekhi, Tong Li, Suchitra Muenthaisong, Troels T Nielsen, Dong Li, Shengting Li, Stoyan Petkov and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular reproduction and development, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Jan O SecherVeterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Ahmet CeylanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine Ankara University, Department of Histology and Embryology, Diskapi, Ankara, Turkey.
Gianluca MazzoniAnimal Breeding, Quantitative Genetics and Systems Biology Group, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Kaveh MashayekhiFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Tong LiFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Suchitra MuenthaisongBioTalentum Ltd., Gödöllő, Hungary.
Troels T NielsenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dong LiFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Shengting LiDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Stoyan PetkovInstitute for Farm Animal Genetics (FLI), Neustadt, Germany.
Susanna CireraFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Yonglun LuoDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Lori ThombsDepartment of Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Haja N KadarmideenAnimal Breeding, Quantitative Genetics and Systems Biology Group, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Andras DinnyesBioTalentum Ltd., Gödöllő, Hungary.
Lars BolundDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Bernard A J RoelenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Mette SchmidtVeterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Henrik CallesenDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Poul HyttelFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Kristine K FreudeFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DKBioTalentum (Hungary) · HUUtrecht University · NLAnkara University · TRRigshospitalet · DKSchön Klinik Neustadt · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Derivation and stable maintenance of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSCs) is challenging. We herein systematically analyzed two piPSC lines, derived by lentiviral transduction and cultured under either leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) or fibroblast growth factor (FGF) conditions, to shed more light on the underlying biological mechanisms of porcine pluripotency. LIF-derived piPSCs were more successful than their FGF-derived counterparts in the generation of in vitro chimeras and in teratoma formation. When LIF piPSCs chimeras were transferred into surrogate sows and allowed to develop, only their prescence within the embryonic membranes could be detected. Whole-transcriptome analysis of the piPSCs and porcine neonatal fibroblasts showed that they clustered together, but apart from the two pluripotent cell populations of early porcine embryos, indicating incomplete reprogramming. Indeed, bioinformatic analysis of the pluripotency-related gene network of the LIF- versus FGF-derived piPSCs revealed that ZFP42 (REX1) expression was absent in both piPSC-like cells, whereas it was expressed in the porcine inner cell mass at Day 7/8. A second striking difference was the expression of ATOH1 in piPSC-like cells, which was absent in the inner cell mass. Moreover, our gene expression analyses plus correlation analyses of known pluripotency genes identified unique relationships between pluripotency genes in the inner cell mass, which are to some extent, in the piPSC-like cells. This deficiency in downstream gene activation and divergent gene expression may be underlie the inability to derive germ line-transmitting piPSCs, and provides unique insight into which genes are necessary to achieve fully reprogrammed piPSCs. 84: 229-245, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsFibroblast Growth FactorsGene Expression RegulationInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLeukemia Inhibitory FactorSwineBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsFibroblast Growth FactorsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLeukemia Inhibitory Factor

Identifiers

PMID28044390
PMCPMC6221014
OpenAlexW2561538461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.