ArticleBioMed research international2016
A Novel
Article in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A validated in vitro approach for low-frequency alternating-current stimulation of stem cells: From electrode characterization to biological responses.Protoplasma · 2026Article
- Parameter-resolved AC electrical stimulation links electrical system characteristics to early transcriptional responses in human stem cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Safety and preliminary efficacy of an electrically stimulated implant for mandibular bone regeneration: a pilot study in a large animal model.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Advancing Chronic Wound Healing through Electrical Stimulation and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Exploring the role of directly coupled alternating electric fields on chondrocyte morphology and redifferentiation capacity with a focus on sex differences.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Insights into bone and cartilage responses to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation: a review with quantitative comparisons.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Electrical stimulation for cartilage tissue engineering - A critical review from an engineer's perspective.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Combining Electrostimulation with Impedance Sensing to Promote and Track Osteogenesis within a Titanium Implant.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Article
- Electrical stimulation to promote osseointegration of bone anchoring implants: a topical review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Review
- Electronic Bone Growth Stimulators for Augmentation of Osteogenesis inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Enhancing osteoblast survival through pulsed electrical stimulation and implications for osseointegration.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Review
- Performance of a Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting System for an Energy-Autonomous Instrumented Total Hip Replacement: Experimental and Numerical Evaluation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Continuous Electrical Stimulation Affects Initial Growth and Proliferation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- Alternating Electric Fields Modify the Function of Human Osteoblasts Growing on and in the Surroundings of Titanium Electrodes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts.Cells · 2020Article
- Electrochemical methods to enhance osseointegrated prostheses.Biomedical engineering letters · 2020Review
- Re-Differentiation Capacity of Human Chondrocytes in Vitro Following Electrical Stimulation with Capacitively Coupled Fields.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- A novel electron emission-based cell culture device promotes cell proliferation and differentiation of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical stimulation is a promising approach to enhance bone regeneration while having potential to inhibit bacterial growth. To investigate effects of alternating electric field stimulation on both human osteoblasts and bacteria, a novel
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.