Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28044019›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Resolving the neural dynamics of visual and auditory scene processing in the human brain: a methodological approach.

Radoslaw Martin Cichy, Santani Teng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Decoding the processing stages of mental arithmetic with magnetoencephalography.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Article
  6. Social behaviour as an emergent property of embodied curiosity: a robotics perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modality-Independent Coding of Scene Categories in Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Modelling auditory attention.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  12. Contributions of low- and high-level properties to neural processing of visual scenes in the human brain.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. A roadmap for the study of conscious audition and its neural basis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Auditory and visual scene analysis: an overview.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Radoslaw Martin CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany rmcichy@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4667-4249
Santani TengComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural environments, visual and auditory stimulation elicit responses across a large set of brain regions in a fraction of a second, yielding representations of the multimodal scene and its properties. The rapid and complex neural dynamics underlying visual and auditory information processing pose major challenges to human cognitive neuroscience. Brain signals measured non-invasively are inherently noisy, the format of neural representations is unknown, and transformations between representations are complex and often nonlinear. Further, no single non-invasive brain measurement technique provides a spatio-temporally integrated view. In this opinion piece, we argue that progress can be made by a concerted effort based on three pillars of recent methodological development: (i) sensitive analysis techniques such as decoding and cross-classification, (ii) complex computational modelling using models such as deep neural networks, and (iii) integration across imaging methods (magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography, functional magnetic resonance imaging) and models, e.g. using representational similarity analysis. We showcase two recent efforts that have been undertaken in this spirit and provide novel results about visual and auditory scene analysis. Finally, we discuss the limits of this perspective and sketch a concrete roadmap for future research.This article is part of the themed issue 'Auditory and visual scene analysis'.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyPhotic Stimulationdeep neural networksmultivariate pattern classificationrepresentational similarity analysisscene perception

Identifiers

PMID28044019
PMCPMC5206276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.