Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28044018›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements.

C Pelofi, V de Gardelle, P Egré, D Pressnitzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Auditory scene analysis in music: A synthetic review.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An implicit representation of stimulus ambiguity in pupil size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Auditory and visual scene analysis: an overview.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  10. Resolving the neural dynamics of visual and auditory scene processing in the human brain: a methodological approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Auditory multistability and neurotransmitter concentrations in the human brain.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  12. A roadmap for the study of conscious audition and its neural basis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C PelofiLaboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, CNRS UMR 8248, École normale supérieure - PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
V de GardelleParis School of Economics & CNRS, École normale supérieure - PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
P EgréInstitut Jean Nicod, CNRS UMR 8129, École normale supérieure - PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
D PressnitzerLaboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, CNRS UMR 8248, École normale supérieure - PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France daniel.pressnitzer@ens.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-4744-5165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because musicians are trained to discern sounds within complex acoustic scenes, such as an orchestra playing, it has been hypothesized that musicianship improves general auditory scene analysis abilities. Here, we compared musicians and non-musicians in a behavioural paradigm using ambiguous stimuli, combining performance, reaction times and confidence measures. We used 'Shepard tones', for which listeners may report either an upward or a downward pitch shift for the same ambiguous tone pair. Musicians and non-musicians performed similarly on the pitch-shift direction task. In particular, both groups were at chance for the ambiguous case. However, groups differed in their reaction times and judgements of confidence. Musicians responded to the ambiguous case with long reaction times and low confidence, whereas non-musicians responded with fast reaction times and maximal confidence. In a subsequent experiment, non-musicians displayed reduced confidence for the ambiguous case when pure-tone components of the Shepard complex were made easier to discern. The results suggest an effect of musical training on scene analysis: we speculate that musicians were more likely to discern components within complex auditory scenes, perhaps because of enhanced attentional resolution, and thus discovered the ambiguity. For untrained listeners, stimulus ambiguity was not available to perceptual awareness.This article is part of the themed issue 'Auditory and visual scene analysis'.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionJudgmentReaction TimeAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMusicYoung Adultambiguityhearingmusical trainingShepard tonesvagueness

Identifiers

PMID28044018
PMCPMC5206275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.