Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28044016›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Is predictability salient? A study of attentional capture by auditory patterns.

Rosy Southwell, Anna Baumann, Cécile Gal, Nicolas Barascud, Karl Friston, Maria Chait

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural and autonomic predictors of future listening errors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Modality-general sensitivity of pupil responses to regularity violations.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Interplay of Bottom-Up Arousal and Attentional Capture during Auditory Scene Analysis: Evidence from Ocular Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Discovery, Interruption, and Updating of Auditory Regularities in Memory: Evidence from Low-Frequency Brain Dynamics in Human MEG.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosy SouthwellEar Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, UK.
Anna BaumannEar Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, UK.
Cécile GalEar Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, UK.
Nicolas BarascudÉcole Normale Supérieure, Paris 75005, France.
Karl FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Maria ChaitEar Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, UK m.chait@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7808-3593

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K003399/1Wellcome Trust 088130/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this series of behavioural and electroencephalography (EEG) experiments, we investigate the extent to which repeating patterns of sounds capture attention. Work in the visual domain has revealed attentional capture by statistically predictable stimuli, consistent with predictive coding accounts which suggest that attention is drawn to sensory regularities. Here, stimuli comprised rapid sequences of tone pips, arranged in regular (REG) or random (RAND) patterns. EEG data demonstrate that the brain rapidly recognizes predictable patterns manifested as a rapid increase in responses to REG relative to RAND sequences. This increase is reminiscent of the increase in gain on neural responses to attended stimuli often seen in the neuroimaging literature, and thus consistent with the hypothesis that predictable sequences draw attention. To study potential attentional capture by auditory regularities, we used REG and RAND sequences in two different behavioural tasks designed to reveal effects of attentional capture by regularity. Overall, the pattern of results suggests that regularity does not capture attention.This article is part of the themed issue 'Auditory and visual scene analysis'.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultattentionauditory scene analysiselectroencephalographypredictive codingregularitystatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID28044016
PMCPMC5206273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.