Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28042833›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Brain Vascular Imaging Techniques.

Bàrbara Laviña

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Techniques for Imaging Vascular Supply of Peripheral Nerves.Journal of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Neurophotonics · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bàrbara LaviñaDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden. barbara.lavina-siemsen@igp.uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent major improvements in a number of imaging techniques now allow for the study of the brain in ways that could not be considered previously. Researchers today have well-developed tools to specifically examine the dynamic nature of the blood vessels in the brain during development and adulthood; as well as to observe the vascular responses in disease situations in vivo. This review offers a concise summary and brief historical reference of different imaging techniques and how these tools can be applied to study the brain vasculature and the blood-brain barrier integrity in both healthy and disease states. Moreover, it offers an overview on available transgenic animal models to study vascular biology and a description of useful online brain atlases.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray Computedanimal modelsbrain atlasbrain vascular disorderscomputed tomography (CT)imagingmagnetic resonance angiography (MRA)magnetic resonance angiography (MRI)molecular imagingphotoacoustic imaging (PAI)positron emission tomography (PET)vascular biology

Identifiers

PMID28042833
PMCPMC5297705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.