Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28042170›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on nuclear science2016

Evaluation of Rigid-Body Motion Compensation in Cardiac Perfusion SPECT Employing Polar-Map Quantification.

P Hendrik Pretorius, Karen L Johnson, Michael A King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-modality deep learning-based [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient motion correction for dynamic cardiac PET: Current status and challenges.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P Hendrik PretoriusUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, MA 01655 USA.
Karen L JohnsonUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, MA 01655 USA.
Michael A KingUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, MA 01655 USA.

Funding

PATIENT MOTION DETECTION AND COMPENSATION IN SPECTR01EB001457 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI KING, MICHAEL A · 2003 to 2013
$5.7M
Probing Dose Limits in Cardiac SPECT with Reconstruction and Personalized ImagingR01HL122484 · NHLBI · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KING, MICHAEL A, WERNICK, MILES N · 2014 to 2018
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122484NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently been successful in the development and testing of rigid-body motion tracking, estimation and compensation for cardiac perfusion SPECT based on a visual tracking system (VTS). The goal of this study was to evaluate in patients the effectiveness of our rigid-body motion compensation strategy. Sixty-four patient volunteers were asked to remain motionless or execute some predefined body motion during an additional second stress perfusion acquisition. Acquisitions were performed using the standard clinical protocol with 64 projections acquired through 180 degrees. All data were reconstructed with an ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OSEM) algorithm using 4 projections per subset and 5 iterations. All physical degradation factors were addressed (attenuation, scatter, and distance dependent resolution), while a 3-dimensional Gaussian rotator was used during reconstruction to correct for six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) rigid-body motion estimated by the VTS. Polar map quantification was employed to evaluate compensation techniques. In 54.7% of the uncorrected second stress studies there was a statistically significant difference in the polar maps, and in 45.3% this made a difference in the interpretation of segmental perfusion. Motion correction reduced the impact of motion such that with it 32.8 % of the polar maps were statistically significantly different, and in 14.1% this difference changed the interpretation of segmental perfusion. The improvement shown in polar map quantitation translated to visually improved uniformity of the SPECT slices.

Indexed as

Cardiac ImagingMotion CorrectionSPECT

Identifiers

PMID28042170
PMCPMC5193381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.