Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28041780›Full record

ArticleVaccine2017

Unique cellular and humoral immunogenicity profiles generated by aerosol, intranasal, or parenteral vaccination in rhesus macaques.

Diane L Bolton, Kaimei Song, Georgia D Tomaras, Srinivas Rao, Mario Roederer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nanotechnology of inhalable vaccines for enhancing mucosal immunity.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diane L BoltonImmunoTechnology Section, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
Kaimei SongImmunoTechnology Section, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
Georgia D TomarasDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Srinivas RaoImmunoTechnology Section, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
Mario RoedererImmunoTechnology Section, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States. Electronic address: roederer@nih.gov.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Functional And Phenotypic Characterization Of T Cells In ManZIAAI005021 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI ROEDERER, MARIO · 2009 to 2022
$14.4M
Monoclonal antibody isolation and characterizationZIAAI005126 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI MASON, ROSEMARIE · 2015 to 2025
$10.1M
Development of Aersolized VaccinesZIAAI005090 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI ROEDERER, MARIO · 2009 to 2016
$4.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI005021Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI005090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory mucosa immunization is capable of eliciting both local and distal mucosal immune responses; it is a potentially powerful yet largely unused modality for vaccination against respiratory diseases. Targeting the lower versus upper airways by aerosol delivery alters the immunogenicity profile of a vaccine, although the full extent of this impact is not well characterized. We set out to define the cellular and humoral response profiles elicited by immunization via intranasal, small aerosol droplets, and large aerosol droplets. We compared responses following adenovirus-vectored vaccination by these routes in macaques, either for the generation of primary immune responses or for the boosting of previously primed systemic responses. Aerosol delivery (4 or 10μm diameter droplets, addressing lower or upper airways, respectively) generated the highest magnitude lung CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses, reaching 10-30% vaccine-specific levels in bronchoalveolar lavage cells. In contrast, intranasal delivery was less immunogenic with >10-fold lower peak lung T-cell responses. Systemic (blood) T-cell responses were only observed following 4μm aerosol (and parenteral) immunization, while all delivery routes elicited similar humoral responses. These data demonstrate distinct immune response profiles with each respiratory tract vaccination modality and suggest that small droplet aerosol offers several immunological advantages over other respiratory routes.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdministration, IntranasalImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralInjectionsAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleMacaca mulattaVaccinesVaccinesAerosolImmunogenicityNasalRhesus macaqueVaccine delivery route

Identifiers

PMID28041780
PMCPMC5241230
OpenAlexW2564782837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.