Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28041641›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2017

Time to first cigarette and serum cholesterol levels.

Arielle S Selya, Naa Dede Hesse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arielle S SelyaMaster of Public Health Program, Department of Population Health, University of North Dakota, United States. Electronic address: arielle.selya@med.und.edu.
Naa Dede HesseMaster of Public Health Program, Department of Population Health, University of North Dakota, United States.
Faculty of Public Health · GB

Funding

Research CoresP20GM103442 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI Chris Jurgens · 2012 to 2026
$53.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCigarette smoking is a primary cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, prior research has rarely distinguished smoking behavior from nicotine dependence.

objectiveThe current study presents a novel investigation into whether time to first cigarette (TTFC), a reliable proxy for nicotine dependence, is associated with lipid cholesterol, a biomarker for CVD, after controlling for smoking behavior and other risk factors.

methodsIn total, 3903 current adult smokers were drawn from four consecutive cross-sectional waves (2005-06, 2007-08, 2009-10, and 2011-12) of the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES). Weighted regressions were used to examine whether earlier TTFC is associated with differences in a) numeric values; b) guideline-based binary outcomes of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and the LDL/HDL ratio; and c) 10-year risk scores for CVD.

resultsEarlier TTFC (within 5, 30, or 60 min vs. >60 min) was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with lower HDL (2-3 mg/dL) and a lower odds ratio (OR = 0.70) of having optimal HDL levels, and a lower LDL/HDL ratio (0.14-0.32); these results were consistent across three models (unadjusted, adjusted for smoking behavior, and also adjusted for demographics and other CVD risk factors). Earlier TTFC was also associated (p < 0.05) with higher odds of having sub-optimal total cholesterol levels (OR = 1.55) and higher LDL values (8 mg/dL), but only in the models adjusting for smoking behavior. However, the association of TTFC with 10-year CVD risk scores did not reach significance (p > 0.05).

conclusionMore "addicted" smokers, as indicated by earlier TTFC, have less favorable lipid profiles, even after accounting for current and lifetime smoking history and other CVD risk factors. Future research should further explore whether TTFC could be a useful tool for refining clinically significant CVD risk among smokers.

Indexed as

Time FactorsAdultCholesterolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRacial GroupsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Use DisorderCholesterolCardiovascular diseaseCholesterolNicotine dependenceSmoking

Identifiers

PMID28041641
PMCPMC5258779
OpenAlexW2567008461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.