Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28040825›Full record

Trial reportSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2017

Training patients with schizophrenia to share decisions with their psychiatrists: a randomized-controlled trial.

Johannes Hamann, Anna Parchmann, Nina Sassenberg, Katharina Bronner, Margot Albus, Alwin Richter, Sandra Hoppstock, Werner Kissling

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes HamannPsychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. j.hamann@lrz.tum.de.
Anna ParchmannPsychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Nina SassenbergPsychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Katharina BronnerPsychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Margot AlbusIsar Amper Klinikum München Ost, Haar, Germany.
Alwin RichterBezirkskrankenhaus Mainkofen, Deggendorf, Germany.
Sandra HoppstockBezirkskrankenhaus Kaufbeuren, Kaufbeuren, Germany.
Werner KisslingPsychiatric Department, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEBundeswehrkrankenhaus · DEIsar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany patients with schizophrenia have a desire for shared decision-making (SDM). However, in clinical practice SDM often does not take place. One cause might be that many patients behave passively in the medical encounter, therefore not facilitating SDM. It was the aim of the study to evaluate the effects of a patient directed SDM-training on patients' communicative behavior in the consultation, their attitudes towards decision-making and their long-term adherence.

methodsRandomized-controlled trial comparing a five-session SDM-training for inpatients with schizophrenia with five sessions of non-specific group training. The SDM-training sessions included motivational (e.g. prospects of participation, patient rights) and behavioral aspects (e.g. role plays) and addressed important aspects of the patient-doctor interaction such as question asking or giving feedback.

resultsN = 264 patients were recruited in four psychiatric hospitals in Germany. The SDM-training yielded no group differences regarding the main outcome measure (treatment adherence) at 6 and 12 months after discharge. However, there were short-term effects on patients' participation preferences, their wish to take over more responsibility for medical decisions and (according to their psychiatrists' estimate) their behavior in psychiatric consultations.

conclusionsWhile there was no effect regarding treatment adherence, the shared decision-making training for inpatients with schizophrenia has been shown to increase patients' active behavior in psychiatric consultations during their inpatient treatment. When implemented it should be combined with complementary SDM interventions (decision support tools and communication training for professionals) to yield maximum effects.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHospitals, PsychiatricPatient CompliancePatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsSchizophreniaAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdherenceSchizophreniaShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID28040825
OpenAlexW2562265673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.