ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2017
Machine-learned cluster identification in high-dimensional data.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-explaining artificial intelligence for the classification of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A diagnostic decision support study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Augmenting small biomedical datasets using generative AI methods based on self-organizing neural networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Microbial Features Linked to Medication Strategies in Cardiometabolic Disease Management.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- Machine learning identifies right index finger tenderness as key signal of DAS28-CRP based psoriatic arthritis activity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Euclidean distance-optimized data transformation for cluster analysis in biomedical data (EDOtrans).BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Machine-Learning Analysis of Serum Proteomics in Neuropathic Pain after Nerve Injury in Breast Cancer Surgery Points at Chemokine Signaling via SIRT2 Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Distance-based clustering challenges for unbiased benchmarking studies.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Machine-Learning Points at Endoscopic, Quality of Life, and Olfactory Parameters as Outcome Criteria for Endoscopic Paranasal Sinus Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Chronic Pain Diagnosis Using Machine Learning, Questionnaires, and QST: A Sensitivity Experiment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Machine-Learned Association of Next-Generation Sequencing-Derived Variants in Thermosensitive Ion Channels Genes with Human Thermal Pain Sensitivity Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Clustering benchmark datasets exploiting the fundamental clustering problems.Data in brief · 2020Article
- Machine-learned identification of psychological subgroups with relation to pain interference in patients after breast cancer treatments.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Article
- Current Projection Methods-Induced Biases at Subgroup Detection for Machine-Learning Based Data-Analysis of Biomedical Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- [Generating knowledge from complex data sets in human experimental pain research].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Review
- A Data Science-Based Analysis Points at Distinct Patterns of Lipid Mediator Plasma Concentrations in Patients With Dementia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
- Machine Learning in Human Olfactory Research.Chemical senses · 2019Review
- A machine-learned analysis of human gene polymorphisms modulating persisting pain points to major roles of neuroimmune processes.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-dimensional biomedical data are frequently clustered to identify subgroup structures pointing at distinct disease subtypes. It is crucial that the used cluster algorithm works correctly. However, by imposing a predefined shape on the clusters, classical algorithms occasionally suggest a cluster structure in homogenously distributed data or assign data points to incorrect clusters. We analyzed whether this can be avoided by using emergent self-organizing feature maps (ESOM).
methodsData sets with different degrees of complexity were submitted to ESOM analysis with large numbers of neurons, using an interactive R-based bioinformatics tool. On top of the trained ESOM the distance structure in the high dimensional feature space was visualized in the form of a so-called U-matrix. Clustering results were compared with those provided by classical common cluster algorithms including single linkage, Ward and k-means.
resultsWard clustering imposed cluster structures on cluster-less "golf ball", "cuboid" and "S-shaped" data sets that contained no structure at all (random data). Ward clustering also imposed structures on permuted real world data sets. By contrast, the ESOM/U-matrix approach correctly found that these data contain no cluster structure. However, ESOM/U-matrix was correct in identifying clusters in biomedical data truly containing subgroups. It was always correct in cluster structure identification in further canonical artificial data. Using intentionally simple data sets, it is shown that popular clustering algorithms typically used for biomedical data sets may fail to cluster data correctly, suggesting that they are also likely to perform erroneously on high dimensional biomedical data.
conclusionsThe present analyses emphasized that generally established classical hierarchical clustering algorithms carry a considerable tendency to produce erroneous results. By contrast, unsupervised machine-learned analysis of cluster structures, applied using the ESOM/U-matrix method, is a viable, unbiased method to identify true clusters in the high-dimensional space of complex data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.