Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28039601›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2017

Colonization and community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in maize roots at different depths in the soil profile respond differently to phosphorus inputs on a long-term experimental site.

Chao Wang, Philip J White, Chunjian Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A transcriptional activator fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Towards sustainable agriculture: rhizosphere microbiome engineering.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chao WangDepartment of Plant Nutrition, College of Resources and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Philip J WhiteEcological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK.
Chunjian LiDepartment of Plant Nutrition, College of Resources and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China. lichj@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effects of soil depth and plant growth stages on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) colonization and community structure in maize roots and their potential contribution to host plant phosphorus (P) nutrition under different P-fertilizer inputs were studied. Research was conducted on a long-term field experiment over 3 years. AMF colonization was assessed by AM colonization rate and arbuscule abundances and their potential contribution to host P nutrition by intensity of fungal alkaline phosphatase (ALP)/acid phosphatase (ACP) activities and expressions of ZmPht1;6 and ZmCCD8a in roots from the topsoil and subsoil layer at different growth stages. AMF community structure was determined by specific amplification of 18S rDNA. Increasing P inputs up to 75-100 kg ha

Indexed as

PhosphorusSoil MicrobiologyFertilizersMycorrhizaePlant RootsSoilZea maysFertilizersPhosphorusSoilArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiCommunity structureFungal acid/alkaline phosphataseGene expressionPhosphorus fertilizerSoil depth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.