ArticleOncotarget2017
MiR-21 as prognostic biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing an organ preservation protocol.
Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- A PRISMA meta-analysis for diagnostic value of microRNA-21 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma along with bioinformatics research.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Blood-based circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of head and neck cancer-a systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of miRNAs in Head and Neck Cancers: A Comprehensive Systematic and Meta-Analysis.Cells · 2019Pooled it
- Circulating MicroRNAs as Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers in Human Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Disease markers · 2019Pooled it
- Investigation of miR-21-5p Key Target Genes and Pathways in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on TCGA Database and Bioinformatics Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Serum expression of selected miRNAs in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).Diagnostic pathology · 2019Trial
- Pharmacological Targeting of Angiogenesis in Head and Neck Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bridging tissue repair and epithelial carcinogenesis: epigenetic memory and field cancerization.Cell death and differentiation · 2025Review
- Epithelial‑derived head and neck squamous tumourigenesis (Review).Oncology reports · 2024Review
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of miR-93 in Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Bioinformatics Analysis.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Review
- Intermittent Hypoxia Promotes TAM-Induced Glycolysis in Laryngeal Cancer Cells via Regulation of HK1 Expression through Activation of ZBTB10.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The Potential microRNA Prognostic Signature in HNSCCs: A Systematic Review.Non-coding RNA · 2023Review
- The role of miR-21 as a predictive biomarker and a potential target to improve the effects of chemoradiotherapy against head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of radiation research · 2023Article
- Micro-RNAs, the Cornerstones of the Future of Radiobiology in Head and Neck Cancers?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- MIMRDA: A Method Incorporating the miRNA and mRNA Expression Profiles for Predicting miRNA-Disease Associations to Identify Key miRNAs (microRNAs).Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- New Scenarios in Pharmacological Treatments of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas.Cancers · 2021Review
- Bile reflux and hypopharyngeal cancer (Review).Oncology reports · 2021Review
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic microRNA biomarkers for survival outcome in laryngeal squamous cell cancer.Cancer cell international · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite progress in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in recent decades, including new surgical techniques, radiotherapy advances and chemotherapy schedules, the prognosis for the affected patients has not improved at the same pace, and still, most HNSCC patients are diagnosed in advanced stages. To increase their survival, the development of better screening methods for early detection is required and appropriate tailored therapeutic interventions are desired. The aim of the present study was to evaluate miRNAs as prognostic biomarkers in patients undergoing organ preservation protocol for locally advanced HNSCC. For this purpose, we assessed the global miRNA expression profile of 15 HNSCC patients ('screening set') to identify miRNAs differentially expressed in responders and non-responders to therapy. Four miRNAs differentially expressed in HNSCC samples from the 'screening set' were validated in a different cohort of patients (47 samples - 'validation set'). The results from the 'validation set' showed that the higher expression of one of these miRNAs, miR-21, was negatively associated with the treatment response to the organ preservation protocol (p=0.029). A multivariate analysis showed that, in a model adjusted for age, tumor site, p16 immunoexpression and tumor resectability, high expression of miR-21 remained an independent predictor of poor response to the organ preservation protocol (OR=5.69; 95%CI 1.27-25.58; p=0.023), together with clinical stage IV (OR=5.05; 95%CI 1.22-20.88; p=0.025). Furthermore, considering the entire cohort, patients with high expression of miR-21 had worse survival. A multivariate Cox regression analysis also showed miR-21 (HR=2.05; 95%CI 1.05-4.02; p=0.036) and clinical stage IV (HR=3.17; 95%CI 1.49-6.77; p=0.003) as independent prognostic factors (model adjusted for age, tumor site, tumor resectability, and sets 'screening' or 'validation').In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the evaluation of miR-21 expression could be an important tool for treatment planning and a prognosis predictior for HNSCC patients undergoing organ preservation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.