Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28039366›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2017

The use of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET in the diagnosis of gliomas located in the brainstem and spinal cord.

Caroline Tscherpel, Veronika Dunkl, Garry Ceccon, Gabriele Stoffels, Natalie Judov, Marion Rapp, Philipp T Meyer, Elena Rota Kops, Johannes Ermert, Gereon R Fink and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Astrocytomas of the spinal cord.Neuro-oncology advances · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. [EJNMMI research · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline TscherpelDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Veronika DunklDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Garry CecconDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Gabriele StoffelsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Natalie JudovInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Marion RappDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Philipp T MeyerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Elena Rota KopsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Johannes ErmertInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Gereon R FinkDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nadim J ShahInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Karl-Josef LangenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jülich Aachen Research Alliance · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite an increasing number of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET studies in supratentorial gliomas, studies regarding the usefulness of 18F-FET PET in brainstem and spinal cord gliomas to date remain scarce. Methods: Thirty-six 18F-FET PET scans were performed in 29 patients with brainstem (n = 29 scans) or spinal cord glioma (n = 7 scans). In 32 of 36 PET scans, a dynamic acquisition was performed. Fifteen scans in 15 patients were performed to assess newly diagnosed lesions, and 21 scans were obtained during follow-up: for diagnosing tumor progression (n = 15 scans in 14 patients) as well as for treatment monitoring (n = 6 scans in 3 patients). Four patients underwent additional serial scans (range, 1-2), and 3 of these 4 patients were examined for more than one indication. Maximum and mean tumor/brain ratios (TBRmax/mean) of 18F-FET uptake (20-40 min post injection) as well as kinetic 18F-FET uptake parameters were determined. Final diagnoses were confirmed histologically (54%) or by clinical follow-up (46%). Results: In all newly diagnosed high-grade (n = 3 patients) and in 5 of 11 patients with low-grade gliomas, 18F-FET uptake was increased (TBRmax ≥2.5 and/or TBRmean ≥1.9). In 2 patients with newly diagnosed gliomas without MR contrast enhancement, 18F-FET PET nevertheless showed increased metabolism. At suspected progression, the combination of TBRs with kinetic 18F-FET parameters correctly identified presence or absence of progressive disease in 9 of 11 patients (82%). Conclusions: This preliminary study suggests that 18F-FET PET adds valuable diagnostic information in brainstem and spinal cord glioma, particularly when the diagnostic information derived from MRI is equivocal.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain Stem NeoplasmsChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsSpinal Cord Neoplasms(18F)fluoroethyltyrosineRadiopharmaceuticalsTyrosineamino acid PETbrainstem gliomadynamic acquisitionFETinfratentorial

Identifiers

PMID28039366
PMCPMC5464428
OpenAlexW2565832707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.