Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28039118›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2017

Evolutionary dynamics of tree invasions: complementing the unified framework for biological invasions.

Rafael Dudeque Zenni, Ian A Dickie, Michael J Wingfield, Heidi Hirsch, Casparus J Crous, Laura A Meyerson, Treena I Burgess, Thalita G Zimmermann, Metha M Klock, Evan Siemann and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rafael Dudeque ZenniSetor de Ecologia, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia Aplicada, Caixa Postal 3037, CEP 37200-000 - Lavras-MG - Brazil rafaeldz@gmail.com.
Ian A DickieBio-protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.
Michael J WingfieldForestry & Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Heidi HirschCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
Casparus J CrousForestry & Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Laura A MeyersonDepartment of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Treena I BurgessForestry & Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Thalita G ZimmermannInstituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Metha M KlockDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Evan SiemannBiosciences Department, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Alexandra ErfmeierInstitute for Ecosystem Research, Kiel University, Germany.
Roxana AragonInstituto de Ecologia Regional, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, CONICET. Tucuman, Argentina.
Lia MonttiInstituto de Ecologia Regional, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, CONICET. Tucuman, Argentina.
Johannes J Le RouxCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary processes greatly impact the outcomes of biological invasions. An extensive body of research suggests that invasive populations often undergo phenotypic and ecological divergence from their native sources. Evolution also operates at different and distinct stages during the invasion process. Thus, it is important to incorporate evolutionary change into frameworks of biological invasions because it allows us to conceptualize how these processes may facilitate or hinder invasion success. Here, we review such processes, with an emphasis on tree invasions, and place them in the context of the unified framework for biological invasions. The processes and mechanisms described are pre-introduction evolutionary history, sampling effect, founder effect, genotype-by-environment interactions, admixture, hybridization, polyploidization, rapid evolution, epigenetics, and second-genomes. For the last, we propose that co-evolved symbionts, both beneficial and harmful, which are closely physiologically associated with invasive species, contain critical genetic traits that affect the evolutionary dynamics of biological invasions. By understanding the mechanisms underlying invasion success, researchers will be better equipped to predict, understand, and manage biological invasions.

Indexed as

Contemporary evolutionepigeneticsevolutiongenetic variationinvasion biologysecond-genometree invasions.

Identifiers

PMID28039118
PMCPMC5391705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.