Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28039021›Full record

ArticleAntiviral research2017

Buccal viral DNA as a trigger for brincidofovir therapy in the mousepox model of smallpox.

Ryan Crump, Maria Korom, R Mark Buller, Scott Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antiviral research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Monkeypox virus: An emerging epidemic.Microbial pathogenesis · 2022
    Review
  5. Monkeypox: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Design of inhibitors of thymidylate kinase fromJournal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan CrumpSaint Louis University School of Medicine, 1100 S. Grand Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
Maria KoromThe George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, 2300 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20037, USA.
R Mark BullerSaint Louis University School of Medicine, 1100 S. Grand Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
Scott ParkerSaint Louis University School of Medicine, 1100 S. Grand Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. Electronic address: scott9379@gmail.com.
Saint Louis University · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000021CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000021INIAID NIH HHS N01 AI015436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthopoxviruses continue to pose a significant threat to the population as potential agents of bioterrorism. An intentional release of natural or engineered variola virus (VARV) or monkeypox viruses would cause mortality and morbidity in the target population. To address this, antivirals have been developed and evaluated in animal models of smallpox and monkeypox. One such antiviral, brincidofovir (BCV, previously CMX001), has demonstrated high levels of efficacy against orthopoxviruses in animal models and is currently under clinical evaluation for prevention and treatment of diseases caused by cytomegaloviruses and adenoviruses. In this study we use the mousepox model of smallpox to evaluate the relationship between the magnitude of the infectious virus dose and an efficacious BCV therapy outcome when treatment is initiated concomitant with detection of ectromelia virus viral DNA (vDNA) in mouse buccal swabs. We found that vDNA could be detected in buccal swabs of some, but not all infected mice over a range of challenge doses by day 3 or 4 postexposure, when initiation of BCV treatment was efficacious, suggesting that detection of vDNA in buccal swabs could be used as a trigger to initiate BCV treatment of an entire potentially exposed population. However, buccal swabs of some mice did not become positive until 5 days postexposure, when initiation of BCV therapy failed to protect mice that received high doses of virus. And finally, the data suggest that the therapeutic window for efficacious BCV treatment decreases as the virus infectious dose increases. Extrapolating these findings to VARV, the data suggest that treatment should be initiated as soon as possible after exposure and not rely on a diagnostic tool such as the measurement of vDNA in buccal cavity swabs; however, consideration should be given to the fact that the behavior/disease-course of VARV in humans is different from that of ectromelia virus in the mouse.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCytosineDisease Models, AnimalDNA, ViralEctromelia, InfectiousEctromelia virusMiceMouth MucosaOrganophosphonatesOrthopoxvirusSmallpoxAntiviral AgentsbrincidofovirCytosineDNA, ViralOrganophosphonatesAntiviralBrincidofovirCMX001EctromeliaVariola virusViral DNA

Identifiers

PMID28039021
PMCPMC5291782
OpenAlexW2564504874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.