Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28038987›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2017

Adaptive reorganization of retinogeniculate axon terminals in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus following experimental mild traumatic brain injury.

Vishal C Patel, Christopher W D Jurgens, Thomas E Krahe, John T Povlishock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vishal C PatelDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: vpatel4@vcu.edu.
Christopher W D JurgensDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: cjurgens@vcu.edu.
Thomas E KraheDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: tekrahe@gmail.com.
John T PovlishockDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: john.povlishock@vcuhealth.org.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Keri R Maher · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
VCU Neuroscience Center Core GrantP30NS047463 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI POVLISHOCK, JOHN T · 2003 to 2013
$5.0M
The Axonal Response to Traumatic Brain InjuryR01HD055813 · NICHD · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI POVLISHOCK, JOHN T · 2007 to 2018
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055813NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS047463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathologic process in traumatic brain injury marked by delayed axonal loss, known as diffuse axonal injury (DAI), leads to partial deafferentation of neurons downstream of injured axons. This process is linked to persistent visual dysfunction following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), however, examination of deafferentation in humans is impossible with current technology. To investigate potential reorganization in the visual system following mTBI, we utilized the central fluid percussion injury (cFPI) mouse model of mTBI. We report that in the optic nerve of adult male C57BL/6J mice, axonal projections of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to their downstream thalamic target, dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN), undergo DAI followed by scattered, widespread axon terminals loss within the dLGN at 4days post-injury. However, at 10days post-injury, significant reorganization of RGC axon terminals was found, suggestive of an adaptive neuroplastic response. While these changes persisted at 20days post-injury, the RGC axon terminal distribution did not recovery fully to sham-injury levels. Our studies also revealed that following DAI, the segregation of axon terminals from ipsilateral and contralateral eye projections remained consistent with normal adult mouse distribution. Lastly, our examination of the shell and core of dLGN suggested that different RGC subpopulations may vary in their susceptibility to injury or in their contribution to reorganization following injury. Collectively, these findings support the premise that subcortical axon terminal reorganization may contribute to recovery following mTBI, and that different neural phenotypes may vary in their contribution to this reorganization despite exposure to the same injury.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAxonsBrain Injuries, TraumaticCholera ToxinDisease Models, AnimalGeniculate BodiesMaleMiceNeuronal PlasticityRetinaVesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 2Visual PathwaysCholera ToxinVesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 2Axon terminalsDiffuse axonal injuryLateral geniculate bodiesNeuronal plasticityTraumatic brain injuryVisual system

Identifiers

PMID28038987
PMCPMC5285456
OpenAlexW2565436275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.