Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28038682›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2016

Comparison of a teratogenic transcriptome-based predictive test based on human embryonic versus inducible pluripotent stem cells.

Vaibhav Shinde, Sureshkumar Perumal Srinivasan, Margit Henry, Tamara Rotshteyn, Jürgen Hescheler, Jörg Rahnenführer, Marianna Grinberg, Johannes Meisig, Nils Blüthgen, Tanja Waldmann and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bioinformatics Methods for Transcriptome Analysis on Teratogenesis Testing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Optimization of the TeraTox Assay for Preclinical Teratogenicity Assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  8. A review of possible therapies for multiple sclerosis.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Testing of female reproductive disorders.Archives of toxicology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Reproductive toxicity of boron.EXCLI journal · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vaibhav ShindeInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne (UKK), Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Sureshkumar Perumal SrinivasanInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne (UKK), Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Margit HenryInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne (UKK), Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Tamara RotshteynInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne (UKK), Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Jürgen HeschelerInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne (UKK), Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Jörg RahnenführerDepartment of Statistics, Technical University of Dortmund University, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
Marianna GrinbergDepartment of Statistics, Technical University of Dortmund University, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
Johannes MeisigIntegrative Research Institute for the Life Sciences, Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Nils BlüthgenIntegrative Research Institute for the Life Sciences, Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Tanja WaldmannDoerenkamp-Zbinden Chair for In Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, University of Konstanz, Box: M657, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Marcel LeistDoerenkamp-Zbinden Chair for In Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, University of Konstanz, Box: M657, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Jan Georg HengstlerLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
Agapios SachinidisInstitute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne (UKK), Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 50931, Cologne, Germany. a.sachinidis@uni-koeln.de.
University of Cologne · DETU Dortmund University · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman embryonic stem cells (hESCs) partially recapitulate early embryonic three germ layer development, allowing testing of potential teratogenic hazards. Because use of hESCs is ethically debated, we investigated the potential for human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) to replace hESCs in such tests.

methodsThree cell lines, comprising hiPSCs (foreskin and IMR90) and hESCs (H9) were differentiated for 14 days. Their transcriptome profiles were obtained on day 0 and day 14 and analyzed by comprehensive bioinformatics tools.

resultsThe transcriptomes on day 14 showed that more than 70% of the "developmental genes" (regulated genes with > 2-fold change on day 14 compared to day 0) exhibited variability among cell lines. The developmental genes belonging to all three cell lines captured biological processes and KEGG pathways related to all three germ layer embryonic development. In addition, transcriptome profiles were obtained after 14 days of exposure to teratogenic valproic acid (VPA) during differentiation. Although the differentially regulated genes between treated and untreated samples showed more than 90% variability among cell lines, VPA clearly antagonized the expression of developmental genes in all cell lines: suppressing upregulated developmental genes, while inducing downregulated ones. To quantify VPA-disturbed development based on developmental genes, we estimated the "developmental potency" (D

conclusionsDespite differences in genes deregulated by VPA, uniform D

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineDown-RegulationEmbryonic Stem CellsGerm LayersHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsTeratogensTranscriptomeUp-RegulationTeratogensCytotoxic agentsDifferentiationEmbryoid bodiesEmbryonic stem cellsGenomicsInduced pluripotent stem cells

Identifiers

PMID28038682
PMCPMC5203708
OpenAlexW2563103338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.