Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28038669›Full record

Observational studyBMC palliative care2016

Development and validation of a new patient experience tool in patients with serious illness.

Karl M Fernstrom, Nathan D Shippee, Alissa L Jones, Heather R Britt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01746446 (LifeCourse), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01746446 nacompletednot on this map

LifeCourse: A Supportive Care Approach for Patients Late in Life

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllina Health SystemRan2012 to 2017Enrolled903ConditionsOngoing or Significant Medical ConditionArmsCare team
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karl M FernstromDivision of Applied Research, Allina Health, 2925 Chicago Avenue, Mail Stop #10039, Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA. karl.fernstrom@allina.com.
Nathan D ShippeeDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St. SE, D375 Mayo MMC 729, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Alissa L JonesDivision of Applied Research, Allina Health, 2925 Chicago Avenue, Mail Stop #10039, Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA.
Heather R BrittDivision of Applied Research, Allina Health, 2925 Chicago Avenue, Mail Stop #10039, Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with serious chronic illnesses face increasingly complex care and are at risk of poor experience due to a fragmented health system. Most current patient experience tools are not designed to address the unique care aspects of this population and the few that exist are delivered too late in the disease trajectory and are not administered longitudinally which makes them less useful across settings.

methodsWe developed a new tool designed to address these gaps. The 25 item scale was tested and refined using randomly cross-validated exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Participants were not yet hospice eligible but sick enough to receive benefits of a supportive care approach in the last 2 to 3 years of life. Full information maximum likelihood models were run to confirm the factor structure developed in exploratory analyses. Goodness-of-fit was assessed with the Comparative Fit Index, the Tucker-Lewis Index, and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation. Test-retest reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient and internal consistency of the final scale was examined using Cronbach's alpha.

resultsExploratory factor analysis revealed three domains - Care Team, Communication, and Care Goals - after removing weak loading and cross loading items. The initial three domain measurement model suggested in the development cohort was tested in the validation cohort and exhibited poor fit X

conclusionsWhen administered earlier in the chronic illness trajectory, a new patient experience scale focused on care teams across settings, communication, and care goals, displayed strong reliability and performed well psychometrically. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: This trial ( NCT01746446 ) was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on November 27, 2012 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAgedChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareDementiaFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMinnesotaNeoplasmsPatient Care PlanningPatient Care TeamPatient ComfortProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychometricsChronic diseaseHealth care surveysPatient-centered carePatient experiencePatient-reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID28038669
PMCPMC5203706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.