Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28036361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Proteomic Analysis of Kidney Preservation Solutions Prior to Renal Transplantation.

Abdurrahman Coskun, Ahmet Tarik Baykal, Dilek Kazan, Muslum Akgoz, Merve Oztug Senal, Ibrahim Berber, Izzet Titiz, Gokhan Bilsel, Hakan Kilercik, Kubra Karaosmanoglu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Evolutionary transition from blood feeding to obligate nonbiting in a mosquito.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Abdurrahman CoskunAcibadem University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Tarik BaykalAcibadem University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dilek KazanMarmara University Engineering Faculty, Department of Bioengineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muslum AkgozNational Metrology Institute, Gebze, Turkey.
Merve Oztug SenalNational Metrology Institute, Gebze, Turkey.
Ibrahim BerberAcibadem University School of Medicine Department of General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
Izzet TitizHaydarpasa Numune Research and Training Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gokhan BilselNational Metrology Institute, Gebze, Turkey.
Hakan KilercikYeni Yuzyil University, Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kubra KaraosmanogluMarmara University Engineering Faculty, Department of Bioengineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muslum CicekYeni Yuzyil University, Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ilknur YurtseverIstanbul Medipol University, Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center, Beykoz/Istanbul, Turkey.
Cevat YazıcıErciyes University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Kayseri, Turkey.
Acıbadem University · TRTübitak National Metrology Institute · TRIstanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University · TRMarmara University · TRErciyes University · TRHaydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstanbul Medipol University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main issues in kidney transplantation is the optimal functional preservation of the organ until its transplantation into the appropriate recipient. Despite intensive efforts, the functional preservation period remains limited to hours. During this time, as a result of cellular injury, various proteins, peptides, and other molecules are released by the organ into the preservation medium. In this study, we used proteomic techniques to analyze the protein profiles of preservation solutions in which organs had been preserved prior to their transplantation. Samples were obtained from the preservation solutions of 25 deceased donor kidneys scheduled for transplantation. The protein profiles of the solutions were analyzed using 2D gel electrophoresis/MALDI-TOF and LC-MS/MS. We identified and quantified 206 proteins and peptides belonging to 139 different groups. Of these, 111 proteins groups were belonging to kidney tissues. This study used proteomic techniques to analyze the protein profiles of organ preservation solutions. These findings will contribute to the development of improved preservation solutions to effectively protect organs for transplantation.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidKidneyKidney TransplantationOrgan PreservationOrgan Preservation SolutionsPeptidesProteinsProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryOrgan Preservation SolutionsPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID28036361
PMCPMC5201308
OpenAlexW2570648142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.