Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28036302›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

High expression of miR-181c as a predictive marker of recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer.

Nobuyoshi Yamazaki, Yoshikatsu Koga, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Motohiro Kojima, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Norio Saito, Yasuhiro Matsumura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. MicroRNA-181c-5p modulates phagocytosis efficiency in bone marrow-derived macrophages.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. MicroRNAs: The Link between the Metabolic Syndrome and Oncogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nobuyoshi YamazakiDivision of Developmental Therapeutics, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.
Yoshikatsu KogaDivision of Developmental Therapeutics, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.
Hirokazu TaniguchiPathology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Motohiro KojimaPathology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Yukihide KanemitsuColorectal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio SaitoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Yasuhiro MatsumuraDivision of Developmental Therapeutics, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA standard treatment for stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) is surgical resection without adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the recurrence rate of these patients is approximately 20%. To date, there are no robust biomarkers suitable for predicting recurrence in stage II CRC patients. In this study, microRNAs (miRNAs) extracted from CRC tissues were examined for a possible biomarker to predict recurrence in stage II CRC patients.

resultsFrom the comprehensive analysis, 15 miRNAs were selected as candidates for further study. Regarding let-7a, -7d, -7e, miR-23c, -26b, -128a, -151-5p, and -181c, recurrence rates in training cohort patients with higher expression of these miRNAs isolated from their frozen tissues samples were significantly higher than those with lower expression (P < 0.05). According to multivariate analysis, the higher expression of miR-181c was detected as an independent predictive factor of recurrence (P = 0.001, OR: 9.43, 95% CI: 2.57-34.48). Results were similar in miR-181c extracted from FFPE tissues obtained from the training cohort (P = 0.003, OR: 7.46, 95% CI: 1.97-28.57). In the validation cohort using FFPE tissues, the recurrence rate in patients with higher miR-181c expression was significantly higher than those with lower miR-181c expression (P < 0.001). MATERIALS AND

methodsComprehensive analysis using a highly sensitive miRNA chip was initially performed to select candidate miRNAs associated with recurrence. Candidate miRNAs were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR using RNA from frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues.

conclusionsHigher expression of miR-181c may be a useful recurrence predictor of stage II CRC patients.

Indexed as

Up-RegulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIrn181 microRNA, humancolorectal cancermiR-181cpredictor of recurrencetissue microRNA

Identifiers

PMID28036302
PMCPMC5351683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.