Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28036287›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

N-glycosylation converts non-glycoproteins into mannose receptor ligands and reveals antigen-specific T cell responses in vivo.

Christoph Kreer, Janina M Kuepper, Matthias Zehner, Thomas Quast, Waldemar Kolanus, Beatrix Schumak, Sven Burgdorf

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Soluble mannose receptor induces proinflammatory macrophage activation and metaflammation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph KreerLife and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Janina M KuepperInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology (IMMIP), University Hospital Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Matthias ZehnerLife and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Thomas QuastLife and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Waldemar KolanusLife and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Beatrix SchumakInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology (IMMIP), University Hospital Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Sven BurgdorfLife and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-glycosylation is generally accepted to enhance the immunogenicity of antigens because of two main reasons. First, the attachment of glycans enables recognition by endocytic receptors like the mannose receptor (MR) and hence increased uptake by dendritic cells (DCs). Second, foreign glycans are postulated to be immunostimulatory and their recognition could induce DC activation. However, a direct comparison between the immunogenicity of N-glycosylated vs. de-glycosylated proteins in vivo and a direct effect of N-glycosylated antigens on the intrinsic capacity of DCs to activate T cells have not been assessed so far.To analyze whether enforced N-glycosylation is a suited strategy to enhance the immunogenicity of non-glycosylated antigens for vaccination studies, we targeted non-glycoproteins towards the MR by introduction of artificial N-glycosylation using the methylotrophic yeast Komagataella phaffii (previously termed Pichia pastoris). We could demonstrate that the introduction of a single N-X-S/T motif was sufficient for efficient MR-binding and internalization. However, addition of N-glycosylated proteins neither influenced DC maturation nor their general capacity to activate T cells, pointing out that enforced N-glycosylation does not increase the immunogenicity of the antigen per se. Additionally, increased antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell responses in vivo after injection of N-glycosylated compared to de-glycosylated proteins were observed but this effect strongly depended on the epitope tested. A beneficial effect of N-glycosylation on antibody production could not be detected, which might be due to MR-cross-linking on DCs and to concomitant differences in IL-6 production by CD4+ T cells.These observations point out that the effect of N-glycosylation on antigen immunogenicity can vary between different antigens and therefore might have important implications for the development of vaccines using K. phaffii.

Indexed as

Lymphocyte ActivationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAnimalsbeta-GalactosidaseCell CommunicationCell ProliferationCoculture TechniquesCytokinesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicDendritic CellsEpitopesGlycosylationHEK293 CellsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineLectins, C-Typebeta-GalactosidaseCytokinesEpitopesLectins, C-TypeLigandsMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorOvalbuminReceptors, Cell SurfaceVaccines, Syntheticantigen presentationcross-presentationKomagataella phaffiireceptor-mediated endocytosisT cell activation

Identifiers

PMID28036287
PMCPMC5351675
OpenAlexW2565764493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.