ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2017
Reovirus safety study for proliferation and differentiation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Cytopathic Mammalian Orthoreovirus Infection Triggers Innate Immune Responses in Human Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Implications for Cell Therapy Quality Control.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of the Effect of Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Secretome with and without Reovirus in CT26 Cells.Archives of Razi Institute · 2022Article
- The oncolytic efficacy and safety of avian reovirus and its dynamic distribution in infected mice.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Review
- Primary lymphocyte infection models for KSHV and its putative tumorigenesis mechanisms in B cell lymphomas.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Naturally occurring reoviruses are live replication-proficient viruses specifically infecting human cancer cells while sparing the normal counterparts. Stem cells can be highly susceptible to viral infection due to their innate high proliferation potential and other active signaling pathways of cells that might be involved in viral tropism. In the previous study, we showed that reoviruses could adversely affect murine embryonic stem cells' integrity in vitro and in vivo. Oncolytic viruses, delivered systemically face many hurdles that also impede their localization and infection of, metastatic tumors, due to a variety of immune and physical barriers. To overcome such hurdles to systemic delivery, several studies supported the idea that certain types of cells, including mesenchymal stem cells, might play a role as cell carriers for oncolytic viruses. Thus, it would be interesting to examine whether human adult stem cells such as human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells could be saved by the reoviral challenge. In this study, we report that biological activities such as proliferation and multipotency of human adipose-derived stem cells are not affected by wild-type reovirus challenge as evidenced by survival, osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential assays following treatment with reoviruses. Therefore, unlike murine embryonic stem cells, our study strongly suggests that human adipose-derived adult stem cells could be spared in vivo during wild-type reoviral anti-cancer therapeutics in a clinical setting. Furthermore, the results support the possible clinical use of human adipose-derived stem cells as an effective cell carrier of oncolytic reovirus to maximize their tumor tropism and anti-tumor activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.