Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28035436›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Six-year activity on approval of compassionate use of medicines by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Bologna (Italy): time to update rules and recommendations.

Nicola Montanaro, Mauro Melis, Stefania Proni, Giacomo Chiabrando, Domenico Motola

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Procedures for application of the extended dosing after antitumor drug clinical trials.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola MontanaroUniversity of Bologna, University Hospital St. Orsola-Malpighi,, Via Albertoni 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy. nicola.montanaro@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-8077
Mauro MelisUnit of Pharmacology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Stefania ProniUniversity Hospital St. Orsola-Malpighi, Via Albertoni 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Giacomo ChiabrandoUniversity Hospital St. Orsola-Malpighi, Via Albertoni 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Domenico MotolaUnit of Pharmacology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Irnerio 48, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCompassionate use of forthcoming drugs has become an increasing pathway through which patients can take advantage of promising medicines. We aimed to analyse the main features of the requests of compassionate use submitted to the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) of the University Hospital of Bologna in the period 2010-2015.

methodsThe present analysis concerns the requests of compassionate use received by the IEC in the period 2010-2015. For each requested drug, we paired the date of the first request to our IEC with the date(s) of (a) submission to EMA, (b) CHMP positive opinion, and (c) European marketing authorization (if issued).

resultsIn the period 2010-2015, our IEC received compassionate use requests for 610 patients. Most of the requests concerned patients suffering from solid or haematological cancers not responsive to first or second line of treatment. Sixty-five couples of medicine/clinical condition (corresponding to 56 individual medicines) were submitted to our IEC, and 62 of them regarded products following the centralised procedure at the EMA. Twenty-one out of the latter (34%) had already obtained CHMP positive opinion.

conclusionsOur results indicate that compassionate use of forthcoming medicines represents a not negligible portion of the therapies utilized in hospital care. The observed large resort to medicines still on trial may suggest that doctors are more aware with the potential benefits of the new drugs. However, this trend may also indicate an increasing marketing activity of the pharmaceutical industry, addressing to get the clinicians used to the upcoming medicines.

Indexed as

Compassionate Use TrialsDrug IndustryEthics CommitteesHumansItalyCompassionate useEMAEthics CommitteeNew drugs

Identifiers

PMID28035436
OpenAlexW2561902048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.