Easy Extraction of Terms and Definitions with OWL2TL.

John Judkins, Joseph Utecht, Mathias Brochhausen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in CEUR workshop proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John JudkinsDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.

Joseph UtechtDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.

Mathias BrochhausenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.

Funding

Trauma Institutional Priorities and Teams for Outcome Efficacy (TIPTOE)R01GM111324 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BROCHHAUSEN, MATHIAS, SEXTON, KEVIN WAYNE · 2015 to 2025

$3.1M

NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111324

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facilitating good communication between semantic web specialists and domain experts is necessary to efficient ontology development. This development may be hindered by the fact that domain experts tend to be unfamiliar with tools used to create and edit OWL files. This is true in particular when changes to definitions need to be reviewed as often as multiple times a day. We developed "OWL to Term List" (OWL2TL) with the goal of allowing domain experts to view the terms and definitions of an OWL file organized in a list that is updated each time the OWL file is updated. The tool is available online and currently generates a list of terms, along with additional annotation properties that are chosen by the user, in a format that allows easy copying into a spreadsheet.

Indexed as

controlled vocabularyontology developmentsemantic websoftwareweb application

Identifiers

PMID28035214

PMCPMC5189984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.