Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28035207›Full record

ReviewImmune network2016

Unusual CD4

Ga Hye Lee, Won-Woo Lee

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immune network, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Aging and Inflammation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Increased frequency of CD4Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  19. CD28F1000Research · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ga Hye LeeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine and BK21Plus Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Won-Woo LeeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine and BK21Plus Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Seoul National University College of Medicine; Ischemic/Hypoxic Disease Institute and Institute of Infectious Diseases, Seoul National University College of Medicine; Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul 03080, Korea.
New Generation University College · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD28 is a primary co-stimulatory receptor that is essential for successful T cell activation, proliferation, and survival. While ubiquitously expressed on naive T cells, the level of CD28 expression on memory T cells is largely dependent on the T-cell differentiation stage in humans. Expansion of circulating T cells lacking CD28 was originally considered a hallmark of age-associated immunological changes in humans, with a progressive loss of CD28 following replicative senescence with advancing age. However, an increasing body of evidence has revealed that there is a significant age-inappropriate expansion of CD4

Indexed as

CD28CD4+CD28− T cellsChronic inflammatory diseasesCo-stimulatory receptorCytotoxic potential

Identifiers

PMID28035207
PMCPMC5195841
OpenAlexW2563258949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.